ArticleScientific reports2025
Data driven design of ultra high performance concrete prospects and application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dataset on the reproducibility of UHPC mechanical properties under a fixed recipe with controlled production variability.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Data-driven optimisation of sustainable high-performance concrete incorporating SCMs, biomass ash, and graphene nanoplatelets.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Low-carbon ultra-high-performance concrete: raw materials, particle packing optimization, and data-driven performance assessment-a review.Low-carbon materials and green construction · 2026Review
- Comparative machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance concrete.PloS one · 2026Article
- Monitoring of ultra-high performance concrete manufacturing for reproducible quality and waste reduction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is a specialized class of cementitious composites that is increasingly used in various applications, including bridge decks, connections between precast components, piers, columns, overlays, and the repair and strengthening of bridge elements. The mechanical and durability properties of UHPC are significantly influenced by factors such as low water-to-binder ratios, the inclusion of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), and fiber reinforcement. Machine learning (ML) has been employed to predict the performance of UHPC and optimize its mixture designs by using various raw materials. This study first provides a comprehensive review of ML applications in UHPC, focusing on predicting workability, mechanical, and thermal properties. The use of data crossing, generative AI, physics-guided ML models, and field-applicable software are explored as practical directions for future research. This study also develops ML models to predict the compressive strength of UHPC by using a database containing 1300 data-records. The influence of various input variables is evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), revealing that chemical compositions have relatively minor impacts, given the material types used. By excluding insignificant variables, the models enhance both efficiency and accuracy in predicting strength. This advancement facilitates optimized material design and performance prediction while reducing the experimental workload required to inform ML models. Adding more diverse data to the database could further enhance the prediction performance and generalizability of the proposed ML models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.