Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102596›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025

CAR-NK cell therapy combined with checkpoint inhibition induces an NKT cell response in glioblastoma.

F Strassheimer, P Elleringmann, G Ludmirski, B Roller, J Macas, T Alekseeva, P Cakmak, B Aliraj, H Krenzlin, M C Demes and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Current Status and Evolution of Immunotherapy in Glioma Management.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

F StrassheimerGoethe University, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
P ElleringmannGoethe University, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
G LudmirskiGoethe University, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
B RollerGoethe University, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
J MacasFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
T AlekseevaFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
P CakmakFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
B AlirajFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
H KrenzlinUniversity Medical Center Mainz, Department of Neurosurgery, Mainz, Germany.
M C DemesFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
I C MildenbergerGoethe University, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
T TonnFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-2193
K J WeberFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
Y ReissFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
K H PlateFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
A WeigertFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-1952
W S WelsFrankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9858-3643
J P SteinbachGoethe University, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
M C BurgerGoethe University, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. burger@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-0987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with limited efficacy of established therapies, and a pronounced immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Targeting HER2 with local immunotherapy allows for high tumor specificity in the brain with physiologically very low expression. Monotherapy with CAR-NK cells targeted against HER2 has previously shown efficacy in medium-sized GL261/HER2 tumors.

methodsAdvanced GL261/HER2 tumors were treated by local CAR-NK cell injection combined with systemic anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Tumor growth and survival were monitored. In-depth characterization of the microenvironment was performed by multiplex immune fluorescence, spectral flow cytometry and RNAseq.

resultsUntreated GL261/HER2 tumors were characterized by local immunosuppression and high PD-L1 expression. Combined treatment with NK-92/5.28.z and systemic anti-PD-1 induced robust anti-tumor response and long-term survival. Multiplex immunofluorescence and spectral flow cytometry showed increased CD4

conclusionThe combination therapy reverted the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment with increased T and NKT cell infiltration. This resulted in successful treatment of advanced orthotopic tumors refractory to CAR-NK cell monotherapy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalNatural Killer T-CellsAnimalsB7-H1 AntigenCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorB7-H1 AntigenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID40102596
PMCPMC12041480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.