ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of various drying technologies for evaluation of drying kinetics, energy consumption, physical and bioactive properties of Rose flower.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enabled Shrinkage Analysis and Morphology Control in Food Processing: Mechanisms, Multimodal Perception, Modeling, and Intelligent Regulation.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- The Effect of Pretreatments and Infrared Drying on the Quality of White Radish Slices.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of infrared assisted refractance window drying on physicochemical and quality attributes and thermodynamic analysis of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of combined ethanol and ultrasound pretreatment on energy consumption and bioactive compounds of rose petals in hot air drying.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The process after harvesting medicinal plants, such as drying, is very important in the production cycle of these plants. The study's objective is to evaluate the effect of different drying methods on some thermodynamic properties, qualitative and bioactive attributes, and yield of rose essential oil in form of a completely randomized design. The treatments of this study included drying in refractance window (RW), infrared (IR), and convective (CV) at three drying temperatures of 50, 60, and 70 °C, as well as fresh plants. The results showed that different drying methods and temperatures significantly affected the essential oil, thermodynamic, qualitative, bioactive, and yield characteristics. The lowest drying time, energy consumption, and the highest energy efficiency and rehydration ratio in the dried rose samples were related to the drying temperature of 70 °C in the RW method. The reduction of drying time by RW method compared to IR and CV methods was between 11.1-21.40 and 45.9-50%, respectively. The highest amount of antioxidant activity, total phenol, flavonoid and essential oil yield was observed in the RW drying method and at the drying temperature of 60 °C. This study showed that compared to other drying methods, the RW method showed a high quality in drying Rose flowers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.