ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation comparison of multiple models for perioperative neurocognitive disorders during hip arthroplasty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug-specific effects of anxiety on high-dose oxycodone: age as a modifier for oxycodone response.Behavioural pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to develop optimal predictive models for perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) in hip arthroplasty patients, thereby advancing clinical practice. Data from all hip arthroplasty patients in the MIMIC-IV database were utilized to predict PND. With 62 variables, we applied multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network (ANN), Naive Bayes, support vector machine, and decision tree (XgBoost) algorithms to forecast PND. Feature analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve plotting, and sensitivity, specificity, and F-measure β = 1 (F1-score) assessments were conducted on both training and validation sets for classifying models' effectiveness. Brier score and Index of prediction accuracy (IPA) were employed to compare prediction capabilities in both sets. Among 3,292 hip arthroplasty patients in the MIMIC database, 331 developed PND. Five models using different algorithms were constructed. After thorough comparison and validation, the ANN model emerged as the most effective model. Performance metrics on the training set for the ANN model were: ROC: 0.954, Accuracy: 0.938, Precision: 0.758, F1-score: 0.657, Brier Score: 0.048, IPA: 90.8%. On the validation set, the ANN model performed as follows: ROC: 0.857, Accuracy: 0.903, Precision: 0.539, F1-score: 0.432, Brier Score: 0.071, IPA: 71.4%. An online visualization tool was developed ( https://xyyy.pythonanywhere.com/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.