ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel scale for anxiety-related fixation instability during laser in situ keratomileusis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cohort study aimed to investigate the correlation between the severity of anxiety during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and fixation instability, as measured and plotted by the eye tracker during photo-ablation, and to develop a novel quantitative scale for anxiety-related fixation instability. LASIK was performed to correct myopia and hypermetropia with and without astigmatism in 2435 eyes of 2435 patients. Participants fulfilled the seven-item anxiety sub-score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale questionnaire for scaling patients' anxiety levels before LASIK into normal, borderline, and anxiety case groups. The eye-tracking pupil center position plots, patient's heart rate, and surgeon-reported level of patient's cooperation during the procedure were analyzed. An anxiety-related fixation instability score (FIS) was calculated, for which the best cut-off points to differentiate between normal, borderline, and anxiety case groups were defined. The FIS showed a high performance in separating participants into normal, borderline, and anxiety case groups and when used as a scale (0-90), values from 0 to 12 are considered normal, from 13 to 36 are considered borderline, and from 37 to 90 are considered anxiety cases. The FIS and scale are useful objective tools to quantify anxiety-related fixation instability during LASIK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.