Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102563›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

ARCUNet: enhancing skin lesion segmentation with residual convolutions and attention mechanisms for improved accuracy and robustness.

Tanishq Soni, Sheifali Gupta, Ahmad Almogren, Ayman Altameem, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Seada Hussen, Salil Bharany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tanishq SoniChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Sheifali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Ahmad AlmogrenDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, 11633, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ayman AltameemDepartment of Natural and Engineering Sciences, College of Applied Studies and Community Services, King Saud University, 11543, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ateeq Ur RehmanSchool of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, 13120, Republic of Korea. 202411144@gachon.ac.kr.
Seada HussenDepartment of Electrical Power, Adama Science and Technology University, 1888, Adama, Ethiopia. seada.hussen@aastu.edu.et.
Salil BharanyChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin lesion segmentation presents significant challenges due to the high variability in lesion size, shape, color, and texture and the presence of artifacts like hair, shadows, and reflections, which complicate accurate boundary delineation. To address these challenges, we proposed ARCUNet, a semantic segmentation model including residual convolutions and attention techniques to improve segmentation accuracy to address the challenges of skin lesion segmentation, By incorporating residual convolutions and attention mechanisms, ARCUNet enhances feature learning, stabilizes training, and sharpens focus on lesion boundaries for improved segmentation accuracy. Residual convolutions ensure better gradient flow and faster convergence, while attention mechanisms refine feature selection by emphasizing critical lesion regions and suppressing irrelevant details. The model was tested on the ISIC 2016, 2017, and 2018 datasets with outstanding segmentation results with accuracy measures of 98.12%, 96.45%, and 98.19%, Dice measures of 94.68%, 91.21%, and 95.34%, and Jaccard measures of 91.14%, 88.33%, and 93.53%, respectively. These findings signify the ability of ARCUNet to segment skin lesions accurately and thus as an effective tool for computerized skin disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSkinSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansDermatologyDiagnosisHealthMedicalMelanomaPoorSkin cancer

Identifiers

PMID40102563
PMCPMC11920274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.