ArticleScientific reports2025
ARCUNet: enhancing skin lesion segmentation with residual convolutions and attention mechanisms for improved accuracy and robustness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Choroidal Boundary Detection in Geographic Atrophy Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A U-Net model for epidermal segmentation in optical coherence tomography images of actinic keratosis.PloS one · 2026Article
- WA-NET: enhanced boundary-aware segmentation of skin lesions via frequency-spatial feature fusion and attention-guided edge refinement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AttenUNeT X with iterative feedback mechanisms for robust deep learning skin lesion segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deep learning-based dual-branch framework for automated skin lesion segmentation and classification via dermoscopic Images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin lesion segmentation presents significant challenges due to the high variability in lesion size, shape, color, and texture and the presence of artifacts like hair, shadows, and reflections, which complicate accurate boundary delineation. To address these challenges, we proposed ARCUNet, a semantic segmentation model including residual convolutions and attention techniques to improve segmentation accuracy to address the challenges of skin lesion segmentation, By incorporating residual convolutions and attention mechanisms, ARCUNet enhances feature learning, stabilizes training, and sharpens focus on lesion boundaries for improved segmentation accuracy. Residual convolutions ensure better gradient flow and faster convergence, while attention mechanisms refine feature selection by emphasizing critical lesion regions and suppressing irrelevant details. The model was tested on the ISIC 2016, 2017, and 2018 datasets with outstanding segmentation results with accuracy measures of 98.12%, 96.45%, and 98.19%, Dice measures of 94.68%, 91.21%, and 95.34%, and Jaccard measures of 91.14%, 88.33%, and 93.53%, respectively. These findings signify the ability of ARCUNet to segment skin lesions accurately and thus as an effective tool for computerized skin disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.