ArticleScientific reports2025
Carbon management in massive electric vehicle temporal and spatial scheduling with automotive electronic forensics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electric vehicles (EVs) provide an environmentally friendly solution to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. However, increasing EV adoption and distributed solar generation pose new challenges for power systems, such as increased load variability and forecasting complexity. High penetration levels of EVs and rooftop photovoltaics introduce operational challenges that traditional power systems were not designed to handle. This study proposes a novel two-layer optimization model to address these issues by coordinating the scheduling of EVs, generators, and solar power. The upper-layer optimization focuses on coordinating EV charging and discharging schedules with thermal generators and base load in the transmission grid, considering solar power availability. The lower-layer optimization addresses spatial scheduling of EV loads in the distribution grid. To evaluate the proposed strategy, simulations were conducted on a benchmark system comprising an 8-unit transmission network interconnected with an IEEE 33-bus distribution feeder. The results demonstrate that the proposed two-layer optimization model reduces total operational costs by 22.8% compared to the ACM-PSO model, while achieving a 4.3% improvement in peak-valley difference reduction, effectively enhancing load balancing. These results highlight the economic and operational advantages of the proposed strategy, particularly in addressing challenges like peak load management and network efficiency. Additionally, the model integrates solar power efficiently and incorporates location-specific forensic data collection from EVs, providing valuable insights for distribution network planning and operation. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing EV load placement and scheduling to improve grid performance and support sustainable energy adoption.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.