ArticleScientific reports2025
Metagenomic analysis of the faecal microbiota and AMR in roe deer in Western Pomerania.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus spp. and Mammaliicoccus sciuri isolated from rehabilitating wild mammals in northeastern Brazil: implications for microbiological surveillance and biosafety in wildlife care facilities.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Microbiome and resistome of the European bison (Bison bonasus).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal parasites of red and roe deer investigated via metagenomics and histology.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- A multi-matrix workflow for isolation, characterization, and biobanking of antimicrobial- resistant bacteria from One Health surveillance samples.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Cultivated Gut Microbiota of Roe Deer and Red Deer in Central Poland Forest.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Impact of Organic and Conventional Husbandry Systems on the Gut Microbiome and Resistome in Pigs.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an integral part of the global wellbeing, the health of wild animals should be regarded just as important as that of humans and livestock. The investigation of wildlife health, however, is limited by the availability of samples. In an attempt to implement a method with little invasiveness and broad areas of application, shotgun metagenomics were utilised to investigate the faecal microbiome and its antimicrobial resistance genes (AMRG) in roe deer. These genes can facilitate antimicrobial resistances (AMR) in bacteria and are therefore of increasing importance in global health. Accordingly, the abundance in potential vectors like wildlife needs to be assessed. The samples were additionally investigated for ESBL-E. coli, an antibiotic resistant pathogen of global concern, via cultivation. Twenty-seven hunt-harvested animals in Western Pomerania were sampled. This study is the first to our knowledge to describe the faecal microbiome of the European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), providing insights into the bacterial and archaeal composition. Among the animals, the microbiome was mostly similar and showed a comparable composition to what has been reported in related species, with a ratio of 1.76 between Bacillota and Bacteroidota. The normalised abundance of AMR genes was found to be 0.035 on average, which is similar to other investigations on wild ruminants. Selective cultivation found no ESBL-E. coli in the animals. The prevalence of AMRG in roe deer of Western Pomerania was found to be in line with previous results. The use of shotgun metagenomics allowed for the simultaneous investigation of composition and AMR genes in the faecal microbiome of roe deer, which suggests it as a promising method for the health monitoring of wildlife. This study is the first to describe the prokaryotic assemblage in the faeces of roe deer and its differences to the microbiomes published on other cervids were discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.