ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterization of rice starch changes in saline and alkaline area under different fertilization conditions based on Raman spectral recognition technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Starch content in rice is one of the important parameters in characterizing the nutritional quality of rice, and the starch content of rice produced in saline soils under different fertilization conditions varies. In this study, Raman spectroscopy combined with three machine learning models, support vector machine (SVM), feedforward neural network, and k-nearest neighbor classification, was used to classify and evaluate the effect of different fertilizer treatments on rice. The collected rice spectral data were normalized before machine learning, then preprocessed with multiple scattering correction (MSC), standard normal variable, and Savitzky-Golay filtering algorithms to improve the quality and reliability of the data. The evaluation indexes such as the confusion matrix and the receiver operating characteristic curve comprehensively analyzed the model's performance. The research shows that the MSC preprocessing method significantly improves the classification accuracy and prediction ability in all three models, and the classification accuracy was close to 100%, while the overall performance of the SVM models after various preprocessing is the best among the three machine learning methods. The predictive coefficient of determination, predictive root mean square error, and predictive average relative error of the starch content detection model built by the SVM model after MSC preprocessing were 0.93, 0.04%, and 0.20%, respectively, which indicated that its prediction had high accuracy and low error. The results of this study used Raman spectroscopy to carry out the identification of different fertilization techniques and rice starch quality correlation characteristics, providing theoretical and experimental support for the rapid identification of rice quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.