Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102538›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identifying influential spreaders based on improving communication transmission model and network structure.

Shimeng Zhang, Zejun Sun, Guan Wang, Haifeng Hu, Feifei Wang, Xiaoyan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shimeng ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan, China.
Zejun SunSchool of Information Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan, China. szj@pdsu.edu.cn.
Guan WangSchool of Information Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan, China.
Haifeng HuSchool of Information Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan, China.
Feifei WangSchool of Information Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan, China.
Xiaoyan SunSchool of Information Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of key nodes has garnered considerable attention across various research domains, including commercial marketing, infectious disease prevention and control, road network optimization, intelligent electricity management, and Chinese medicine formulation design. To evaluate critical nodes within complex networks, numerous algorithms have been proposed. However, these methods exhibit certain limitations such as one-sided considerations and single evaluation indexes. Consequently, the applicability of these key node identification approaches is limited to specific scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel method for identifying key nodes based on principles from communication transmission theory and the law of gravity. Our approach fully explores the network structure and node relationships, integrating the Shannon channel capacity model and the gravity model. This method not only considers a node's own location and importance, but also the proximity of its neighbors to the target node within two hops. Through extensive experimentation, we demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms representative methods proposed in recent years in terms of consistency with the SIR model, similarity of Top-N nodes, and node importance differentiation. Real-world experiments conducted on COVID-19 networks further validate the effectiveness of our approach.

Indexed as

Complex networksGravity modelShannon channel capacitySIR model

Identifiers

PMID40102538
PMCPMC11920100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.