ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on the application and evaluation method of Zen aesthetic style in furniture design under the background of sustainability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A need-driven design research of modular functional armchairs for young adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design of a user-centered intelligent shoe cabinet for smart home hygiene using Kano-AHP-TRIZ.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of smart TV user interfaces for older adults based on the perception assessment method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-fuzzy theory.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Research on an intelligent fan cultural sustainability design method based on CPO-CNN-LSSVM.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using entropy weight method and quality function deployment to develop emotion-driven dashboard interfaces for NEV.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A system design method for virtual ceramic creation oriented to authenticity representation: integration of Kano, QFD, and FAST approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The influence of traditional regional architectural culture on Neo-Chinese style furniture design: a case study of the lingnan region in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A methodological design and an empirical study for assessing the maturity of an UASR based on the AHP-EWM and the FSEM fusion model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the application of Zen aesthetics in contemporary furniture design within a sustainable context through rational data analysis, providing innovative insights and a reference framework for modern furniture design. First, grounded theory was employed to collect and evaluate design principles and elements through expert interviews, leading to the establishment of a hierarchical model. Next, the analytic hierarchy process was used to analyze and prioritize the elements of cultural and creative product design by calculating their weights. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was applied for scheme selection and optimization. This study utilized Zen aesthetic-style tea table as a case study, the design was analyzed from the perspectives of aesthetic, functionality, emotionality and safety. The design scheme was optimized by incorporating Zen aesthetic principles, achieving an organic integration of Zen cultural elements with modern furniture design. The feasibility of this approach was validated through the design of a tea table. This comprehensive method addresses the gap in applying Zen aesthetics to modern furniture design, providing a scientific and systematic tool for the design and evaluation of contemporary furniture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.