ArticleScientific reports2025
Hard label adversarial attack with high query efficiency against NLP models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generating imperceptible adversarial examples via low-frequency aware transfer attacks on battery management systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing adversarial resilience in semantic caching for secure retrieval augmented generation systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dialectal substitution as an adversarial approach for evaluating Arabic NLP robustness.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current black-box adversarial attacks have demonstrated significant efficacy in creating adversarial texts against natural language processing models, exposing potential robustness vulnerabilities of these models. However, present attack techniques exhibit inefficiency due to their failure to account for the query counts needed in the adversarial text generation process, causing a disparity between the existing methodology and the practical adversarial attack scenario. To this end, this work proposes a query-efficient hard-label attack method called QEAttack, which leverages the genetic algorithm to produce persuasive and semantically equivalent adversarial texts relying solely on observing the final predicted label output by the victim model. To reduce query counts, a dual-gradient fusion strategy and a locality sensitive hashing based sentence-level semantic clustering strategy are proposed and applied to the crossover and mutation steps, respectively. Extensive experiments and ablation studies are conducted on three victim models with varying architectures across five benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate that QEAttack consistently achieves high attack success rates with significantly reduced query counts, while maintaining or even enhancing the imperceptibility and quality of generated adversarial texts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.