Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102494›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Validating a willingness to share measure of a vignette experiment using real-world behavioral data.

Zoltán Kmetty, Ádám Stefkovics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zoltán KmettyHUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, CSS-RECENS Research Group, Budapest, 1097, Hungary. kmetty.zoltan@tk.hu.
Ádám StefkovicsHUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, CSS-RECENS Research Group, Budapest, 1097, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Willingness measures are widely employed in vignette and conjoint experiments. However, the predictive validity of these measures relies on the degree to which expressed intentions correspond with behavior in the real world. This study uses a unique research design that enables to validate an intention measure. In a 2022 online survey, respondents expressed their willingness to donate their social media data in hypothetical scenarios. Nine months later the same respondents were invited to participate in a genuine data donation study. The results show that the correlation between willingness and actual donation was moderate (η: 0.28). Additionally, the determinants of self-reports and sharing behavior did not overlap. The willingness to donate was more strongly associated with softer attitudinal variables, whereas actual data sharing was linked more closely to harder demographic variables. These findings challenge the predictive validity of willingness to share measures and highlight the need for realistic scenarios in survey experiments, minimizing participants' perceived risks of the task in question, and addressing social desirability bias.

Indexed as

Data donationSurveyValidationVignette experiment

Identifiers

PMID40102494
PMCPMC11920269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.