ArticleScientific reports2025
Vibration signal analysis for rolling bearings faults diagnosis based on deep-shallow features fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid VMD-CNN-autoencoder approach for speed-invariant fault detection of parallel and angular misalignment in rotating machinery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental investigation on the effect of real environmental factors on photovoltaic module power output in Southern Algeria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on fusion of STFT-statistical features and AL-SOA optimized bagging tree.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- SA-ConSinGAN and reservoir computing fusion for accurate bearing fault classification and severity identification using GAF-based techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-source technical assessment and turbine-based energy yield for offshore wind farms: A case study of the Algerian coast.PloS one · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of misalignment faults using the DTCWT-RCMFDE and LSSVM algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing PV power forecasting through feature selection and artificial neural networks: a case study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In engineering applications, the bearing faults diagnosis is essential for maintaining reliability and extending the lifespan of rotating machinery, thereby preventing unexpected industrial production downtime. Prompt fault diagnosis using vibration signals is vital to ensure seamless operation of industrial system avert catastrophic breakdowns, reduce maintenance costs, and ensure continuous productivity. As industries evolve and machines operate under diverse conditions, traditional fault detection methods often fall short. In spite of significant research in recent years, there remains a pressing need for improve existing methods of fault diagnosis. To fill this research gap, this research work aims to propose an efficient and robust system for diagnosing bearing faults, using deep and Shallow features. Through the evaluated experiments, our proposed model Multi-Block Histograms of Local Phase Quantization (MBH-LPQ) showed excellent performance in classification accuracy, and the audio-trained VGGish model showed the best performance in all tasks. Contributions of this work include: Combine the proposed Shallow descriptor, derived from a novel hand-crafted discriminative features MBH-LPQ, with deep features obtained from VGGish pre-trained of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using audio spectrograms, by merging at the score level using Weighted Sum (WS). This approach is designed to take advantage of the complementary strengths of both feature models, thus enhancing overall bearing fault diagnostic performance. Furthermore, experiments conducted to verify the approach's performance is assessed based on fault classification accuracy demonstrated a significant accuracy rate on two different noisy datasets, with an accuracy rate of 98.95% and 100% being reached on the CWRU and PU datasets benchmark, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.