ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive analysis of miners' group unsafe behavior based on group dynamics and institutional environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated multimethod analysis of miners' safety behavior and risk interaction for practical applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A simulation study on risk emergence mechanism and transmission path of coal mine workers' unsafe behaviours based on DEMATEL-ISM and Arena simulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coal mining is a typical high-risk industry, and the unsafe behavior of miners is the main reason for the high incidence of coal mining accidents. To prevent and control miners' group unsafe behavior, a research method combining survey design, Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA), and Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) was used to explore the combined effects of multiple antecedent variables of group unsafe behavior and their complex causal relationships with outcomes from the perspectives of group dynamics and institutional environment. The results showed that individual group dynamics or institutional environmental factors do not constitute necessary conditions for group unsafe behavior among miners, but multiple equally effective causal configurations exist. High unsafe behavior among miner groups can be categorized into four types: multidimensional suppression type, lack of safety goals under high-pressure type, lack of safety culture under high-pressure type, and scattered type. Non-high unsafe behavior among miners can be categorized into two kinds: unity and cooperation, as well as cohesion, goal, and culture-driven behavior. The causal paths of high and non-high unsafe behavior exhibit asymmetry. The most influential path leading to high unsafe behavior among miner groups was configuration 1, which was ~ GC1 × ~ GC2 × ~ GPS × ~ GSO × ~ GSC; configuration 6b, which was GC1 × ~ GP × GPS × GSO × GSC, was the most effective in suppressing high unsafe behavior among miner groups, with a raw coverage rate of 0.444. Based on the results, intervention measures were proposed to address the key predictors of high unsafe behaviors in miners' groups. The study accurately identifies the grouping paths of "high unsafe behaviors" and "non-high unsafe behaviors" in the miners' group, providing new avenues for mine safety management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.