Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102454›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effects of ramp width variation on the hydraulic conditions of spillway that affect downstream migrating fish.

Seyed Sobhan Aleyasin, Sedem Kumahor, Mark Francis Tachie, Christos Katopodis, Haitham Ghamry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seyed Sobhan AleyasinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. aleyasss@myumanitoba.ca.
Sedem KumahorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Mark Francis TachieDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Christos KatopodisKatopodis Ecohydraulics Ltd., Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Haitham GhamryFisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An experimental investigation was conducted to elucidate the effects of a 45º upstream spillway ramp with varying spanwise width ratios (10%, 25%, 50%) on the turbulent flow characteristics used to guide fish downstream. A particle image velocimetry system was employed to acquire the velocity field in several vertical and spanwise planes and analyze various statistics including mean velocities, spatial velocity gradient, Reynolds stresses and turbulent kinetic energy. The results indicate that the flow topology depends significantly on the ramp width ratio. However, regardless of the width ratio, a recirculation region was observed near the foot of the spillway and a smaller one formed upstream of the ramp. For the 10% ramp width ratio, the smaller recirculation bubble accompanied by the lower velocity, spatial velocity gradient and turbulent kinetic energy along the test channel generate a more favorable pathway for downstream migrating fish. Although a partial-width ramp (i.e., 10% width ratio) is less costly and easier to retrofit compared to a full-width ramp, it creates some spanwise inhomogeneity which may impact the migration route and time of some fish species, particularly those that swim close to the riverbed.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationFishesWater MovementsAnimalsRheologyRiversModified spillwayParticle image velocimetryRecirculation bubbleSpanwise inhomogeneityTurbulent kinetic energy (TKE)

Identifiers

PMID40102454
PMCPMC11920091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.