Observational studyCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025
Development and initial testing of an illness perception questionnaire for substitute decision makers of critically ill patients: a mixed methods study.
Observational study in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief-IPQ) is used to quantify a patient's understanding of their condition. In critical care settings, substitute decision makers (SDMs) are tasked with making decisions on behalf of patients, but it can be difficult to evaluate how they perceive the patient's illness. We developed the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Substitute Decision Makers (IPQ-SDM) by adapting the Brief-IPQ and testing it with SDMs of patients in critical care.
methodsIn a mixed methods study, we modified the Brief-IPQ for the context of SDMs of critically ill patients using qualitative feedback. We then approached SDMs of critically ill patients three days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission to complete the IPQ-SDM in a prospective observational study. We calculated summary statistics for the individual questions and the total score. We evaluated prespecified associations between individual questions as well as the total score with clinical data that were abstracted from the patient chart.
resultsWe received 44/50 (88%) complete responses with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) total score of 43 (11). Forty-six percent reported that they did not have any in-person visits due to the restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The correlation of total score with the nine equivalents of nursing manpower score (NEMS) was 0.42 (P = 0.005) but it was not correlated (P = 0.07) with the multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS). The total mean (SD) score was higher (i.e., worse) for patients who died in hospital (48.2 [9.7], n = 13) than for those who were discharged alive (40.5 [10.2], n = 31, P = 0.03). Concern regarding the illness was correlated with MODS (Spearman correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.39, P = 0.01) and NEMS (ρ = 0.29, P = 0.04).
conclusionWe observed a modest level of correlation of the IPQ-SDM score with clinical measures in the adult ICU setting. Further research is needed before such a tool is broadly implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40102376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.