Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102364›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2025

The Consistency of Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Definitions in the Context of Musculoskeletal Sports Injuries: A Rapid Review and Critical Exploration of Common Terms of Usage.

Aske Holm-Jensen, Evgenios Vlachos, Louise Kamuk Storm, Corrie Myburgh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aske Holm-JensenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, Denmark. Aholm-jensen@health.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-5673
Evgenios VlachosUniversity of Southern Denmark, University Library of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Louise Kamuk StormDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, Denmark.
Corrie MyburghDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFormal statements articulating the meaning of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention concepts are commonly used in the musculoskeletal sports injuries literature, but appear to be employed inconsistently and incorrectly. Standard definitions, appropriate to athletic health and performance practice, are required to systematically develop the state-of-the-art. To accomplish this, we summarized prevention definitions with the aim of improving conceptual clarity across the musculoskeletal sports injuries literature. MAIN BODY: We used a rapid literature review method, searching Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library reviews/trials, Web of Science, Sports Medicine and Education Index, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases for titles/abstracts for available literature, published in English from database-inception to November 2023. Our search terms were: sport/athlete, injury, primary prevention, secondary prevention, and/or tertiary prevention. Definitions were extracted to create categories illustrating overlap and variation. We extracted definitions from 144 included studies (n). Primary prevention appears focused on mitigating injury risk (n = 52) and preventing initial injuries (n = 42). Secondary prevention appears to address five distinct concepts: preventing recurrences (n = 42), preventing sequelae (n = 41), preventing index injury worsening (n = 27), mitigating injury risk (n = 15), and restoring function (n = 12). Tertiary prevention appears focused on preventing sequelae (n = 17) and restoring function (n = 9).

conclusionsFrom a definition viewpoint, the aim of primary prevention is narrowly conceptualized and consistent in the musculoskeletal sports injury research literature. However, secondary prevention definitions vary substantially, with at least three distinct conceptual aims observable. Tertiary prevention definitions appear infrequently in the literature and when observed tend to overlap with secondary prevention. Currently, researchers are likely to struggle with the formulation of clearly-defined and transferrable research questions relating to the aims of secondary prevention.

Indexed as

Athletic injuriesPrevention aimPrevention classificationPrevention definitionPrevention NomenclaturePrevention objectiveSport injury

Identifiers

PMID40102364
PMCPMC11920493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.