Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102336›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

3D imaging for dental identification: a pilot investigation of a novel segmentation method using an intra oral scanning device.

Harry Perkins, Adam B Rohrlach, Toby Hughes, Alex Forrest, Denice Higgins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harry PerkinsAdelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 3 Helen Mayo South, 30 Frome Road, Adelaide, Australia. Harry.perkins@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4212-9745
Adam B RohrlachSchool of Computer & Mathematical Sciences, Department of Archaeogenetics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Toby HughesAdelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 3 Helen Mayo South, 30 Frome Road, Adelaide, Australia.
Alex ForrestQueensland Health Forensic and Scientific Services, Coopers Plains, Australia.
Denice HigginsAdelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 3 Helen Mayo South, 30 Frome Road, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionForensic dental identification relies on the comparison of antemortem and postmortem dental records. 3D dental imaging presents the potential for detailed anatomical features of teeth to be quantified between individuals in automated identification tools. This study introduces a novel segmentation method to simultaneously remove extraneous data from two images reducing processes and time required during 3D dental image comparisons, and tests this against existing approaches to better understand segmentation techniques for forensic purposes.

methodsSix volunteers had both digital and stone cast full arch dental models created. The casts were scanned and digitized with an intra oral laser scanner, and five different segmentation methods were then applied to all images. Segmented images were compared via a method for aligning 3D images for possible matching (same person) and non-matching (different person) pairings.

resultsAll segmentation methods removed adequate excess materials to provide consistent repeated outcomes in the comparison process, with the novel segmentation method showing equivalent outcomes with existing methodologies. The findings highlight the importance of understanding the process of segmentation in distinguishing between 3D dental imaging and underscore the potential of 3D imaging technologies in forensic odontology.

conclusionThe study demonstrates the efficacy of a new segmentation method in forensic dental identification, offering a faster approach; calling for further validation of these methods within a legal framework.

Indexed as

Forensic DentistryImaging, Three-DimensionalToothAdultHumansLasersMaleModels, DentalPilot Projects3D dental imagingDental identificationForensic odontologyIdentification toolsLaser scanningSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40102336
PMCPMC12491115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.