Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102333›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2025

Application of Exercise Snacks across Youth, Adult and Clinical Populations: A Scoping Review.

Kathryn L Weston, Jonathan P Little, Matthew Weston, Sara McCreary, Vanessa Kitchin, Amrit Gill, Ailsa Niven, Melitta A McNarry, Kelly A Mackintosh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07609290 (Effects of Exercise Snacks on Clinical and Health Outcomes in Sedentary Populations With Chronic Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07609290 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Exercise Snacks on Clinical and Health Outcomes in Sedentary Populations With Chronic Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorChimei Medical CenterRan2026 to 2026Enrolled58ConditionsPrediabetes / Type 2 Diabetes, Sedentary Behaviors, Physical InactivityArmsExercise Snacks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathryn L WestonDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. kathryn.weston@strath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-6389
Jonathan P LittleSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-2008
Matthew WestonApplied Sports, Technology, Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-3004
Sara McCrearySchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Vanessa KitchinSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-2681
Amrit GillSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Ailsa NivenInstitute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Science, Moray House School of Education and Sport, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4118-7460
Melitta A McNarry *Applied Sports, Technology, Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-7477
Kelly A Mackintosh *Applied Sports, Technology, Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-6357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterest in 'exercise snacks' has increased, yet a comprehensive and holistic review of this novel concept is lacking. We aimed to map global research on 'exercise snacks', across youth, adult and clinical populations through a scoping review.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in six databases. Grey literature searches were also conducted. Studies whereby participants were prescribed a structured bout of intense exercise dispersed across the day, or the exercise was explicitly defined as a form of 'snacks', in any setting were included. We used the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) to assess the completeness of exercise descriptions. Data were recorded into spreadsheets, then descriptively analyzed and summarized in graphic form.

resultsThe 45 publications meeting our inclusion criteria represented 33 original studies. These 33 studies enrolled a total of 1118 participants, with a median sample size of 24. Studies were categorized as either acute (n = 12) or chronic (n = 21) trials with both trial types performed across a wide range of participant ages (range 8.7 to 78 years) but mostly conducted on healthy adults and older adults. The majority of studies (20/33) defined the concept as 'exercise snacks', with study context being predominantly the laboratory or home. A wide variety of exercise modes (e.g., cycling, stair climbing, body weight exercises) and comparator conditions (e.g., moderate intensity continuous exercise, prolonged sitting, non-exercise controls) were used. 'Exercise snack' intensity was prescribed more frequently than it was reported, and, of the available data, mean intensity was estimated at 76.9% of maximal heart rate and 5.2 Arbitrary Units (AU) on the Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) CR10 scale. Study outcome measures were predominantly cardiovascular, metabolic, muscular, and psychological, with studies mostly adhering to the CERT, though there was underreporting of detail for the exercise provider, motivation strategies, adverse events and intervention fidelity.

conclusionThe 'exercise snack' concept is being increasingly used to cover an array of exercise models. The most common protocols to date utilize body weight exercises or stair climbing. We recommend 'exercise snacks' terminology is consistently used to describe protocols whereby short, purposeful structured exercise is dispersed throughout the day. Future studies should provide detailed descriptions of their 'exercise snacks' model, through exercise and adverse event reporting checklists.

Identifiers

PMID40102333
PMCPMC11920532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.