Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102328›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Similar working memory outcomes with successive versus concurrent presentation of tones and colors.

Nelson Cowan, Dominic Guitard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nelson CowanPsychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. cowann@missouri.edu.
Dominic GuitardSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. guitardd@cardiff.ac.uk.

Funding

Working memory, attention, and time: Childhood development and adult functionR01HD021338 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI COWAN, NELSON · 1988 to 2023
$7.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD021338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performance in a short-term or working memory task may depend on the ability to construct and retain a representation of multiple items fitting a single, coherent scheme. Judging by a theoretical tradition based on selective attention tasks, there might be encoding of perceived items into working memory limited to a single coherent stream of information at a time. However, this notion of a single stream seems to conflict with another tradition in which several items can be absorbed into working memory and retained at once. In three large-scale experiments (N ~ 120 per experiment), we examined working memory for series of colors and tones that were presented either successively, with all of one modality before the other, or concurrently, with one tone accompanying each color but uncorrelated with it. The single-stream account would suggest considerable difficulty for the concurrent presentation method. However, no such effect was obtained. There was no effect of the presentation method in the recognition of items (Experiments 1 and 2) and only a small modifying effect in memory for the serial position of items (Experiment 3). All experiments replicated earlier findings of a detrimental effect of having to retain two sets compared to one, and of an asymmetry in which the dual-set effect was larger for the visual modality. The extant evidence supports a theory in which multiple, separate episodic streams can be encoded into working memory concurrently, provided that the rate of information input does not exceed a rate of processing.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualSerial LearningAdultFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultAttentionAudiovisual attentionBimodal memoryEncoding versus maintenanceWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID40102328
PMCPMC12143922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.