Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102268›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Engineering the bone reconstruction surgery: the case of the masquelet-induced membrane technique.

Marjorie Durand, Laurent Mathieu, Julien Venant, Alain-Charles Masquelet, Jean-Marc Collombet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The road to the Pearl-String Technique: lessons learned from early IMT modifications using RIA autograft and cancellous allograft granules.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Two-Stage Fixation in a Rat Model of the Induced Membrane: A Novel Surgical Technique.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marjorie DurandDepartment of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), 1 Place du Général Valérie André, BP 40073, Brétigny sur Orge Cedex, 91222, France. durand.irba@orange.fr.
Laurent MathieuDepartment of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), 1 Place du Général Valérie André, BP 40073, Brétigny sur Orge Cedex, 91222, France.
Julien VenantDepartment of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), 1 Place du Général Valérie André, BP 40073, Brétigny sur Orge Cedex, 91222, France.
Alain-Charles MasqueletNational Academy of Medicine, 16 rue Bonaparte, Paris, 75006, France.
Jean-Marc CollombetDepartment of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), 1 Place du Général Valérie André, BP 40073, Brétigny sur Orge Cedex, 91222, France.

Funding

Délégation Générale de l'Armement PDH-SAN-1-206/2404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reconstruction of large bone defects remains challenging for orthopedic surgeons. Autologous bone grafts (ABGs) are the gold standard treatment for limited size defects, but larger bone defects (> 5 cm) require the use of more sophisticated techniques, such as the Masquelet technique. Over the last three decades, the Masquelet or induced membrane technique (IMT) has become increasingly popular as it does not require high-precision microsurgery skills and the time taken to achieve bone consolidation is independent of the length of the defect. IMT is a two-stage procedure. In the first stage, a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement spacer is implanted into the bone lesion and a physiological immune reaction initiates the formation of a fibrotic induced membrane (IM) with both angiogenic and osteogenic properties. The second stage, performed several weeks later, involves removal of the spacer followed by the implantation of a standard ABG in the preserved IM cavity for subsequent bone repair. In this extensive review, we explain how the success of this surgical procedure can be attributed to the synergy of four key components: the inducer (the PMMA cement), the recipient (the IM), the effector (the bone graft) and the modulator (the mechanical environment). Conversely, we then explain how each key component can contribute to the failure of such treatment. Finally, we discuss existing or emerging innovative and biotechnology-oriented strategies for optimizing surgical outcome with respect to the four components of IMT described above.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationPlastic Surgery ProceduresBone CementsHumansPolymethyl MethacrylateBone CementsPolymethyl MethacrylateBone repairForeign body reactionInduced membraneMasqueletOrthopedic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40102268
PMCPMC11919993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.