Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102255›Full record

ReviewRecent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer2025

Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, and Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Friedhelm Raue, Karin Frank-Raue

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Friedhelm RaueEndocrine Practice, Heidelberg, Germany. friedhelm.raue@raue-endokrinologie.de.
Karin Frank-RaueEndocrine Practice, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare neuroendocrine tumor originating from thyroid C cells that produces mainly calcitonin (Ctn) and is used as a tumor marker. MTC can occur either sporadically (75%) or in a hereditary variant (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, MEN2) due to germline mutations in the RET proto-oncogene. The discovery of MTC in a patient has several diagnostic implications involving a specific strategy, preoperative evaluation of the tumor marker Ctn and the extent of the disease, classification of MTC as sporadic or hereditary using germline RET testing, screening for associated endocrinopathies in hereditary MTC, and somatic RET testing in sporadic MTC. Elevated Ctn is a highly sensitive and specific tumor marker for the diagnosis and follow-up of MTC. Ctn is directly related to the tumor mass. In patients with nodular thyroid disease, MTC can be diagnosed by Ctn determination. Ctn is an indicator of tumor burden. Patients with confirmed sporadic or hereditary MTC should undergo total thyroidectomy. Depending on the preoperative Ctn value, additional dissection of the lymph nodes in the central and lateral neck compartments should be performed. In MEN 2 patients diagnosed by RET mutation analysis, the timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy depends on the specific RET mutation and Ctn level.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineThyroid NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCalcitoninGerm-Line MutationHumansMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2aProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retThyroidectomyBiomarkers, TumorCalcitoninMAS1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanCalcitoninMedullary thyroid carcinomaMultiple endocrine neoplasia type 2RET proto-oncogene

Identifiers

PMID40102255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.