ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
Maximizing the accuracy of genetic variance estimation and using a novel generalized effective sample size to improve simulations.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the interactions between design optimization, modeling strategies, and spatial analysis in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- MateR: a novel genomic mating framework.Genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageWe developed an improved variance estimation that incorporates prediction error variance as a correction factor, alongside a novel generalized effective sample size to enhance simulations. This approach enables precise control of variance components, accommodating for more flexible and accurate simulations. Phenotypic variation in field trials results from genetic and environmental factors, and understanding this variation is critical for breeding program simulations. Additive genetic variance, a key component, is often estimated using linear mixed models (LMM), but can be biased due to improper scaling of the genomic relationship matrix. Here, we show that this bias can be minimized by incorporating prediction error variance (PEV) as a correction factor. Our results demonstrate that the PEV-based estimation of additive variance significantly improves accuracy, with root mean square errors orders of magnitude lower than traditional methods. This improved accuracy enables more realistic simulations, and we introduce a novel generalized effective sample size (ESS) to further refine simulations by accounting for sampling variation. Our method outperforms standard simulation approaches, allowing flexibility to include complex interactions such as genotype by environment effects. These findings provide a robust framework for variance estimation and simulation in genetic studies, with broad applicability to breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.