Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Factors associated with satisfaction with oral sedation during ophthalmic surgeries.
Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate patient and surgical characteristics associated with higher patient, surgeon, or anesthesia provider satisfaction with oral sedation in ophthalmic procedures.
designThis was a secondary analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial measuring patient satisfaction comparing oral versus intravenous (IV) sedation for ophthalmic surgeries.
methodsData was collected from a validated 6-point satisfaction survey from patients, surgeons, and anesthesia providers. We focused on the oral sedation arm and used multivariate regression analysis to investigate the relationship between satisfaction scores and patients' characteristics, surgery duration, and need for additional anesthesia during the ophthalmic procedure.
resultsIn total, 142 patients receiving initial oral triazolam with IV placebo were included in this study. Non-White (p = 0.02) and non-English speaker patients (p = 0.003) had higher satisfaction scores with oral sedation. Shorter surgery duration was associated with higher satisfaction scores for both patients (p = 0.01) and surgeons (p = 0.03) but not for anesthesia providers (p = 0.21). The need for supplemental IV sedation intraoperatively was significantly associated with lower satisfaction scores among patients (p < 0.001), surgeons (p < 0.001), and anesthesia providers (p < 0.001).
conclusionsShorter length of surgery was positively associated with higher patient and surgeon satisfaction with oral sedation. Other factors including non-White race and non-English primary language were associated with higher patient satisfaction. Additional IV sedation needed during surgery was associated with worse patient, surgeon, and anesthesia provider satisfaction. Tailoring oral sedation to procedures that are shorter in duration may help maximize the success of oral sedation as an alternative to intravenous sedation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40102221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.