Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102172›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Effects of a natural phytogenic feed additive on broiler performance, carcass traits, and gut health under diets with optimal and reduced energy and amino acid density.

Maged A Al-Garadi, Rashed A Alhotan, Elsayed O Hussein, Mohammed M Qaid, Gamaleldin M Suliman, Mohammed A Al-Badwi, Esam H Fazea, Isiaka O Olarinre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The sambiloto (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of dietary supplementation withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maged A Al-GaradiAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Rashed A AlhotanAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Elsayed O HusseinAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed M QaidAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: mqaid@ksu.edu.sa.
Gamaleldin M SulimanAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A Al-BadwiAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Esam H FazeaAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Isiaka O OlarinreAnimal Production Department, Food and Agriculture Sciences College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytogenic feed additives are gaining attention as potential alternatives to enhance broiler growth performance and feed efficiency. The experiment investigated the effects of supplementing broiler diets over 35 days with two levels of Fibrafid (0.15 % and 0.25 %) under two dietary regimes: normal amino acid density and metabolizable energy (ME) levels (referred to as positive control diet plus Fibrafid: PC1+0.15 % or PC1+0.25 % Fibrafid) and diets with a 5 % reduction in amino acid density and a 1.5 % reduction in ME (referred to as negative control diet plus Fibrafid: NC1+0.15 % or NC1+0.25 % Fibrafid) on performance parameters and carcass attributes of Ross 308 broilers. These were compared to standard positive control diets (PC1 and PC2, without or with TURBO Grow) and negative control diets (NC1 and NC2, without or with TURBO Grow). Performance indicators were estimated during 0-9, 11-23, 24-35, and 0-35. On day 35, the carcass characteristics and jejunal histopathology were evaluated. Results demonstrated significant improvements in body weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) with Fibrafid inclusion, particularly at 0.25 % over trail. Fibrafid supplementation compensated for reduced dietary energy and protein, leading to improved growth performance, and gizzard and Bursa weights compared to negative control diets. Compared to NC1, the PC1+0.25 % Fibrafid show a significant improvement in jejunal villus morphology, leading to an increase in villus width, height, surface area, and goblet cell density by 5.3 %, 4.8 %, 12.5 %, and 56.7 % respectively. In conclusion, Fibrafid supplementation positively impacts growth performance and intestinal structure, potentially improving nutrient absorption, and jejunal integrity in broilers, proving Fibrafid's promise as a viable option in modern poultry nutrition.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsChickensMeatAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnergy MetabolismMaleRandom AllocationAmino AcidsBroilerCarcass traitsEnergy and amino acid restrictionFibrafidGrowth curve

Identifiers

PMID40102172
PMCPMC12540259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.