ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Exploring the current usage of and attitudes towards transanastomotic tube (TAT) feeding in infants born with duodenal atresia: a survey of practice in the UK.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicians' post-operative feeding decisions for infants with congenital duodenal obstruction and trans-anastomotic tube usage: a qualitative interview and focus group study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Management of congenital duodenal obstruction in neonates: a 10-year retrospective cohort study from a National Children's Hospital.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite evidence demonstrating clinical and cost benefits of transanastomotic tubes (TATs), following repair of congenital duodenal obstruction they are used in a minority of infants in the UK. Most infants are fed using parenteral nutrition (PN) (sometimes in combination with a TAT). This variation is unexplained by clinical or demographic factors. We aimed to understand why this is and the barriers to practice change.
methodsUK-based clinicians (surgeons, neonatologists, dietitians and specialist nurses) completed an online mixed methods survey. Open-ended replies were summarised thematically. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
results109 clinicians (24 neonatologists, 7 nurses, 3 dietitians, 75 surgeons) from all 25 UK neonatal surgical units completed the survey. 88% (n=96/109) stated TAT use was decided solely by surgeons, driven primarily by considerations of providing appropriate nutrition and risks; 36% of surgeons felt TATs should always be used where possible. Decisions about central venous catheters (CVCs) were made by neonatologists (28%, n=31/109), surgeons (17%, n=18/109), jointly (48%, n=52/109) or 'other' (7%, n=8/109). Neonatologists and surgeons prioritised providing appropriate nutrition and risks when deciding whether to use CVCs/PN; surgeons rated a lack of supporting research and TATs' risks as key barriers to TAT usage. Costs and parents' preferences had limited influence on TAT and PN usage.
conclusionsIncreased TAT usage requires surgeons to be persuaded of TATs' efficacy and safety, and neonatologist recognition that exclusive TAT feeding (ie, without CVCs/PN) can provide adequate nutrition. Further work is required to appreciate how best to achieve this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.