ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2025
Family physicians' perspectives on advising patients on an obstetric delivery location: Study from a remote community.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Qualitative research in family medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine what factors individual physicians in a remote northern Saskatchewan community consider when advising patients on an obstetric delivery location.
designSemistructured interviews.
settingLa Ronge, a remote northern Saskatchewan community.
participantsEleven family physicians providing full-scope care in a remote medical clinic.
methodsEach physician at the only medical clinic in the area was sent an email in February 2017 inviting them to be involved in the study. Interviews were conducted between February and April 2017 and were audiorecorded and manually transcribed. The transcribed interviews were returned to participants for their review and additional input. Saturation was reached after 9 interviews, with 2 further interviews being conducted after saturation for a total of 11 interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken following the interviews. MAIN
findingsPatient choice was an important factor in the discussion about delivery location. Themes that evolved from physician consideration on delivery location included benefits of local delivery, local resources, selection of low-risk pregnancies, physician and nursing skills, and patient choice.
conclusionFamily physicians should provide patients with all potential options for delivery location and support the decision made with the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.