Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40101758›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent mental health2025

Scoping review: potential harm from school-based group mental health interventions.

Carolina Guzman-Holst, Rowan Streckfuss Davis, Jack L Andrews, Lucy Foulkes

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Transdiagnostic prevention in youth mental health, Part II: interventions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolina Guzman-HolstDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rowan Streckfuss DavisDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jack L AndrewsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lucy FoulkesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

The Prudence Trust CQR02370Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 227640/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of evidence demonstrates that school-based mental health interventions may be potentially harmful. We define potential harm as any negative outcome or adverse event that could plausibly be linked to an intervention. In this scoping review, we examine three areas: the types of potential harms and adverse events reported in school-based mental health interventions; the subgroups of children and adolescents at heightened risk; and the proposed explanations for these potential harms.

methodsWe searched eight databases (1960-2023), performed an author search and hand-searched for published and unpublished studies that evaluated controlled trials of school-based group mental health interventions based on cognitive-behavioural therapy and/or mindfulness techniques, with the aim of reducing or preventing internalising symptoms or increasing wellbeing. Two independent raters screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality using Cochrane tools. From eligible studies, we reviewed those that reported at least one negative outcome.

resultsTen out of 112 (8.93%) interventions (described in 120 studies) reported at least one negative outcome such as a decrease in wellbeing or an increase in depression or anxiety. Three out of 112 interventions (2.68%) reported the occurrence of specific adverse events, none of which were linked to the intervention. Of the 15/120 studies rated as high quality (i.e. those with low risk of bias), 5/15 (33.33%) reported at least one negative outcome. Negative outcomes were found for a number of subgroups including individuals deemed at high risk of mental health problems, male participants, younger children and children eligible for free school meals. About half (54.5%) of the studies acknowledged that the content of the intervention itself might have led to the negative outcome.

conclusionTo design and implement effective school-based mental health interventions, the issues of potential harm and their related measurement and reporting challenges must be addressed.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMindfulnessPsychotherapy, GroupSchool Mental Health ServicesAdolescentChildHumansadolescentsCBTharmsinterventionsmindfulnessSchool

Identifiers

PMID40101758
PMCPMC12351197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.