ArticleChild and adolescent mental health2025
Scoping review: potential harm from school-based group mental health interventions.
Article in Child and adolescent mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of School-Based Psycho-Educational Interventions in Preventing Sub-clinical Anxiety and Stress in Adolescents.Clinical child psychology and psychiatry · 2026Review
- Small-Scale School-Based Cancer Education to Improve Awareness and Risk Reduction Knowledge Among Adolescents: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Adolescents' trajectories of mental health in the MYRIAD trial.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- Annual Research Review: Improving school climate to improve child and adolescent mental health and reduce inequalities.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Review
- The role of schools in mental health promotion and prevention: a document analysis of Swedish local mental health policies.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Editorial Perspective: How spreading mental health information can be (un-) helpful - a dynamic systems approach.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Article
- Potential harm from universal school-based mental health interventions: Candidate mechanisms and future directions.Current opinion in psychology · 2026Review
- Transdiagnostic prevention in youth mental health, Part II: interventions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Early interventions for self-harm among children and young people in educational and primary-care settings: a scoping review.Cogent mental health · 2026Review
- Optimising the implementation of a universal web-based mental health service for Australian secondary schools: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- Debate: Where to next for universal school-based mental health interventions? Time to move towards more effective alternatives.Child and adolescent mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA growing body of evidence demonstrates that school-based mental health interventions may be potentially harmful. We define potential harm as any negative outcome or adverse event that could plausibly be linked to an intervention. In this scoping review, we examine three areas: the types of potential harms and adverse events reported in school-based mental health interventions; the subgroups of children and adolescents at heightened risk; and the proposed explanations for these potential harms.
methodsWe searched eight databases (1960-2023), performed an author search and hand-searched for published and unpublished studies that evaluated controlled trials of school-based group mental health interventions based on cognitive-behavioural therapy and/or mindfulness techniques, with the aim of reducing or preventing internalising symptoms or increasing wellbeing. Two independent raters screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality using Cochrane tools. From eligible studies, we reviewed those that reported at least one negative outcome.
resultsTen out of 112 (8.93%) interventions (described in 120 studies) reported at least one negative outcome such as a decrease in wellbeing or an increase in depression or anxiety. Three out of 112 interventions (2.68%) reported the occurrence of specific adverse events, none of which were linked to the intervention. Of the 15/120 studies rated as high quality (i.e. those with low risk of bias), 5/15 (33.33%) reported at least one negative outcome. Negative outcomes were found for a number of subgroups including individuals deemed at high risk of mental health problems, male participants, younger children and children eligible for free school meals. About half (54.5%) of the studies acknowledged that the content of the intervention itself might have led to the negative outcome.
conclusionTo design and implement effective school-based mental health interventions, the issues of potential harm and their related measurement and reporting challenges must be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.