Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40101714›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2025

Sequential co-assembly reduces computational resources and errors in metagenome-assembled genomes.

Hannah M Lynn, Jeffrey I Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah M LynnEdison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Newman Center for Gut Microbiome and Nutrition Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Jeffrey I GordonEdison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Newman Center for Gut Microbiome and Nutrition Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: jgordon@wustl.edu.

Funding

NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARD-MEDICAL SCIENTISTT32GM007200 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YOKOYAMA, WAYNE M. · 1985 to 2024
$59.8M
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION - SMALL INTESTINER01DK030292 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY I GORDON, ANDREI L OSTERMAN · 1986 to 2026
$6.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK030292NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generating metagenome-assembled genomes from DNA shotgun sequencing datasets can demand considerable computational resources. Here, we describe a sequential co-assembly method that reduces the assembly of duplicate reads through successive application of single-node computing tools for read assembly and mapping. Using a simulated mouse microbiome DNA shotgun sequencing dataset, we demonstrated that this approach shortens assembly time, uses less memory than traditional co-assembly, and produces significantly fewer assembly errors. Applying sequential co-assembly to shotgun sequencing reads from (1) a longitudinal study of gut microbiomes from undernourished Bangladeshi children and (2) a 2.3-terabyte dataset generated from gnotobiotic mice colonized with pooled microbiomes from these children that was too large to be handled by a traditional co-assembly approach also demonstrated significant reductions in assembly time and memory requirements. These results suggest that this approach should be useful in resource-constrained settings, including in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMetagenomeAnimalsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMiceSequence Analysis, DNAassembly timeBowtieCP: MicrobiologyCP: Systems biologyMEGAHITmemory requirementsmetagenome-assembled genomesmisassembly errorssequential co-assemblyshotgun DNA sequencing readssingle-node computing tools

Identifiers

PMID40101714
PMCPMC12049710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.