ArticleCell reports methods2025
Sequential co-assembly reduces computational resources and errors in metagenome-assembled genomes.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 2Pipe starts with a question: matching you with the correct pipeline for MAG reconstruction.mSystems · 2026Review
- DVOUG enables robust DNA sequence assembly and reconstruction with a dynamic, variable-order graph.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Bin Chicken: targeted metagenomic coassembly for the efficient recovery of novel genomes.Nature methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generating metagenome-assembled genomes from DNA shotgun sequencing datasets can demand considerable computational resources. Here, we describe a sequential co-assembly method that reduces the assembly of duplicate reads through successive application of single-node computing tools for read assembly and mapping. Using a simulated mouse microbiome DNA shotgun sequencing dataset, we demonstrated that this approach shortens assembly time, uses less memory than traditional co-assembly, and produces significantly fewer assembly errors. Applying sequential co-assembly to shotgun sequencing reads from (1) a longitudinal study of gut microbiomes from undernourished Bangladeshi children and (2) a 2.3-terabyte dataset generated from gnotobiotic mice colonized with pooled microbiomes from these children that was too large to be handled by a traditional co-assembly approach also demonstrated significant reductions in assembly time and memory requirements. These results suggest that this approach should be useful in resource-constrained settings, including in low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.