ArticleJournal of environmental management2025
Long-term field study of nitrate and ammonium remediation using a permeable reactive barrier at a livestock feeding operation.
Article in Journal of environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protecting groundwater is a global challenge in modern agriculture. Nutrients from livestock detritus and manure have caused adverse effects on ecosystems and posed health risks associated with use of contaminated groundwater. Such occurred at a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) where failed manure containment and buried carcasses led to toxic concentrations of ammonium and nitrate in groundwater. Here we evaluate a two-step approach to remediate ammonium using pump-and-treat technology, and nitrate using a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) composed of locally sourced hay as a carbon source to drive denitrification. Long-term monitoring (10-year dataset) revealed that effective mitigation of total nitrogen was accomplished through several mechanisms. Ammonium initially developed in the PRB from mineralization of protein in the hay; however, groundwater conditions permitted the possibility of dissimilatory nitrate reduction. Total nitrogen mitigation is attributed to anaerobic ammonium oxidation and denitrification. The reducing environment induced by the PRB caused reduction of iron oxyhydroxides as evidenced by increased dissolved iron and manganese in groundwater. Increased total phosphorus and arsenic mobilization was also locally observed. Some monitoring wells contained high levels of ammonium released from buried detritus. While the PRB effectively removed nitrate, elevated total phosphorus in stream water exceeded recommended limits and placed surface water at continued risk for eutrophication even ten years after installation. Locally sourced carbon sources deployed in a PRB can effectively mitigate nitrogen contamination in groundwater; however, future applications of organic carbon systems should consider the possible mobilization of secondary contaminants including phosphorus, arsenic, iron, and manganese.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.