Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40101484›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental management2025

Long-term field study of nitrate and ammonium remediation using a permeable reactive barrier at a livestock feeding operation.

Michael Lawrinenko, Lee Rhea, Kenneth J Forshay, Tony R Lee, Mark White, Richard T Wilkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael LawrinenkoCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA. Electronic address: lawrinenko.michael@epa.gov.
Lee RheaCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.
Kenneth J ForshayCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.
Tony R LeeCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.
Mark WhiteCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.
Richard T WilkinCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protecting groundwater is a global challenge in modern agriculture. Nutrients from livestock detritus and manure have caused adverse effects on ecosystems and posed health risks associated with use of contaminated groundwater. Such occurred at a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) where failed manure containment and buried carcasses led to toxic concentrations of ammonium and nitrate in groundwater. Here we evaluate a two-step approach to remediate ammonium using pump-and-treat technology, and nitrate using a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) composed of locally sourced hay as a carbon source to drive denitrification. Long-term monitoring (10-year dataset) revealed that effective mitigation of total nitrogen was accomplished through several mechanisms. Ammonium initially developed in the PRB from mineralization of protein in the hay; however, groundwater conditions permitted the possibility of dissimilatory nitrate reduction. Total nitrogen mitigation is attributed to anaerobic ammonium oxidation and denitrification. The reducing environment induced by the PRB caused reduction of iron oxyhydroxides as evidenced by increased dissolved iron and manganese in groundwater. Increased total phosphorus and arsenic mobilization was also locally observed. Some monitoring wells contained high levels of ammonium released from buried detritus. While the PRB effectively removed nitrate, elevated total phosphorus in stream water exceeded recommended limits and placed surface water at continued risk for eutrophication even ten years after installation. Locally sourced carbon sources deployed in a PRB can effectively mitigate nitrogen contamination in groundwater; however, future applications of organic carbon systems should consider the possible mobilization of secondary contaminants including phosphorus, arsenic, iron, and manganese.

Indexed as

Ammonium CompoundsNitratesAgricultureAnimalsGroundwaterLivestockManureNitrogenWater Pollutants, ChemicalAmmonium CompoundsManureNitratesNitrogenWater Pollutants, ChemicalCarcass disposalDenitrificationPermeable reactive barrierSecondary contaminant mobilizationSwine manure

Identifiers

PMID40101484
PMCPMC12019682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.