Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40101243›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2025

Safety, efficacy, and treatment satisfaction in adults with ITP who switched to avatrombopag from another TPO-RA.

Michael D Tarantino, Kailash Mosalpuria, Scott Kolodny, Jessica Zhang, Michael Vredenburg, Brian D Jamieson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04638829 (Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label Study Measuring Safety and Treatment Satisfaction in Adult Subjects With Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04638829 phase4completednot on this map

Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label Study Measuring Safety and Treatment Satisfaction in Adult Subjects With Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) After Switching to Avatrombopag From Eltrombopag or Romiplostim

TypeinterventionalSponsorSobi, Inc.Ran2021 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsImmune ThrombocytopeniaArmsAvatrombopag Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael D TarantinoBleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute, Peoria, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-0069-8176
Kailash MosalpuriaNebraska Hematology Oncology Cancer Center, Lincoln, NE.
Scott KolodnySobi, Inc, Morrisville, NC.
Jessica ZhangSobi, Inc, Morrisville, NC.
Michael VredenburgSobi, Inc, Morrisville, NC.
Brian D JamiesonSobi, Inc, Morrisville, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThis phase 4, multicenter, open-label study was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and treatment satisfaction of switching to avatrombopag from another thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Adults who had received ≥90 days of treatment with eltrombopag or romiplostim and had a response (2 platelet counts [PCs] ≥50 × 109/L) switched to avatrombopag with no protocol-defined washout period. The primary end point was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients who had a PC between ≥50 × 109/L and ≤200 × 109/L (days 15, 30, 60, and 90) and change from baseline in each domain of the self-administered Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) to day 90. Among 60 enrolled patients, 58.3% experienced TEAEs and 10.0% experienced serious TEAEs (1 related to avatrombopag [thrombocytopenia that resolved]; 5 unrelated [1 unrelated death]). A PC ≥50 × 109/L to ≤200 × 109/L was reported for 51.7%, 31.7% (mean PC, 256.2 × 109/L [standard deviation, 176.7 × 109/L]), 55.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0% at baseline and on days 15, 30, 60, and 90, respectively. TSQM scores increased from baseline to day 90 across all domains (mean change: convenience, +13.5; effectiveness, +14.4; global satisfaction, +14.2; side effects, +8.3). There was no correlation between stable avatrombopag dose (day 90) and previous TPO-RA dose (high or low). Patients with ITP may safely switch from another TPO-RA to avatrombopag and maintain adequate PCs while experiencing improved treatment satisfaction. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04638829.

Indexed as

BenzoatesHydrazinesPurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicReceptors, ThrombopoietinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsThiazolesThrombopoietinAdultAgedDrug SubstitutionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPyrazolesavatrombopagBenzoateseltrombopagHydrazinesPyrazolesReceptors, FcReceptors, ThrombopoietinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsromiplostimThiazolesThiophenesThrombopoietin

Identifiers

PMID40101243
PMCPMC12166367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.