Trial reportBlood advances2025
Safety, efficacy, and treatment satisfaction in adults with ITP who switched to avatrombopag from another TPO-RA.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04638829 (Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label Study Measuring Safety and Treatment Satisfaction in Adult Subjects With Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label Study Measuring Safety and Treatment Satisfaction in Adult Subjects With Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) After Switching to Avatrombopag From Eltrombopag or Romiplostim
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antinuclear antibody titre and its dynamics predict autoimmune disease progression in adults with immune thrombocytopenia.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Switching patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) to avatrombopag from other thrombopoietin receptor agonists: The real-world experience of the Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI).British journal of haematology · 2026Observational
- A systems herbal-to-molecule and transcriptomic strategy identifies emodin as an ESR1-targeting phytochemical driving thrombopoiesis.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
- Avatrombopag in thrombopoietin receptor agonist-naïve patients with immune thrombocytopenia: real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes from the REAL-AVA 3.0 study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Evolving Patterns of TPO-RA Use in Children: A Decade of Single-Centre Experience and Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who switched treatment from eltrombopag or romiplostim to avatrombopag in the United States: Results from the REAL-AVA 3.5 study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Real-world avatrombopag use for immune thrombocytopenia in the United States: the REAL-AVA 2.0 multisite chart review study.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Article
- Outcomes, Treatment Patterns, and Resource Use in European Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia Treated with Avatrombopag.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Case Report: Prolonged thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy in solid tumors requiring long-term thrombopoietin receptor agonist support: a five-patient case series.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- From C481 Resistance Evasion to Platelet Preservation: Rilzabrutinib Redefines ITP Targeted Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThis phase 4, multicenter, open-label study was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and treatment satisfaction of switching to avatrombopag from another thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Adults who had received ≥90 days of treatment with eltrombopag or romiplostim and had a response (2 platelet counts [PCs] ≥50 × 109/L) switched to avatrombopag with no protocol-defined washout period. The primary end point was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients who had a PC between ≥50 × 109/L and ≤200 × 109/L (days 15, 30, 60, and 90) and change from baseline in each domain of the self-administered Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) to day 90. Among 60 enrolled patients, 58.3% experienced TEAEs and 10.0% experienced serious TEAEs (1 related to avatrombopag [thrombocytopenia that resolved]; 5 unrelated [1 unrelated death]). A PC ≥50 × 109/L to ≤200 × 109/L was reported for 51.7%, 31.7% (mean PC, 256.2 × 109/L [standard deviation, 176.7 × 109/L]), 55.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0% at baseline and on days 15, 30, 60, and 90, respectively. TSQM scores increased from baseline to day 90 across all domains (mean change: convenience, +13.5; effectiveness, +14.4; global satisfaction, +14.2; side effects, +8.3). There was no correlation between stable avatrombopag dose (day 90) and previous TPO-RA dose (high or low). Patients with ITP may safely switch from another TPO-RA to avatrombopag and maintain adequate PCs while experiencing improved treatment satisfaction. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04638829.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.