ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Emotion Forecasting: A Transformer-Based Approach.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Momentary Suicidal Ideation From Smartphone Screenshots Using Vision-Language Models: Prospective Machine Learning Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Multimodal Learning in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026Review
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Neuro-semantic graph fusion for explainable depression risk trajectory mapping using a graph-enhanced RoBERTa framework.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Textual emotion recognition to improve real-time communication of disabled people in sustainable environments using an ensemble deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring the emotional states of patients with psychiatric problems has always been challenging due to the noncontinuous nature of clinical assessments, the effect of the health care environment, and the inherent subjectivity of evaluation instruments. However, mental states in psychiatric disorders exhibit substantial variability over time, making real-time monitoring crucial for preventing risky situations and ensuring appropriate treatment.
objectiveThis study aimed to leverage new technologies and deep learning techniques to enable more objective, real-time monitoring of patients. This was achieved by passively monitoring variables such as step count, patient location, and sleep patterns using mobile devices. We aimed to predict patient self-reports and detect sudden variations in their emotional valence, identifying situations that may require clinical intervention.
methodsData for this project were collected using the Evidence-Based Behavior (eB2) app, which records both passive and self-reported variables daily. Passive data refer to behavioral information gathered via the eB2 app through sensors embedded in mobile devices and wearables. These data were obtained from studies conducted in collaboration with hospitals and clinics that used eB2. We used hidden Markov models (HMMs) to address missing data and transformer deep neural networks for time-series forecasting. Finally, classification algorithms were applied to predict several variables, including emotional state and responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
resultsThrough real-time patient monitoring, we demonstrated the ability to accurately predict patients' emotional states and anticipate changes over time. Specifically, our approach achieved high accuracy (0.93) and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 for emotional valence classification. For predicting emotional state changes 1 day in advance, we obtained an ROC AUC of 0.87. Furthermore, we demonstrated the feasibility of forecasting responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, with particularly strong performance for certain questions. For example, in question 9, related to suicidal ideation, our model achieved an accuracy of 0.9 and an ROC AUC of 0.77 for predicting the next day's response. Moreover, we illustrated the enhanced stability of multivariate time-series forecasting when HMM preprocessing was combined with a transformer model, as opposed to other time-series forecasting methods, such as recurrent neural networks or long short-term memory cells.
conclusionsThe stability of multivariate time-series forecasting improved when HMM preprocessing was combined with a transformer model, as opposed to other time-series forecasting methods (eg, recurrent neural network and long short-term memory), leveraging the attention mechanisms to capture longer time dependencies and gain interpretability. We showed the potential to assess the emotional state of a patient and the scores of psychiatric questionnaires from passive variables in advance. This allows real-time monitoring of patients and hence better risk detection and treatment adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.