ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Housing and Health Inequities: A Qualitative Study on Potential Solutions From the Perspectives of Recently Arrived Migrants and Refugees in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Integrating meaningful involvement of people living with non-communicable diseases in India's National NCD Programme: lessons learnt and opportunities for global, regional and national contextualisation and adoption.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Collecting Data on the Social Determinants of Health to Advance Health Equity in Cancer Care in Canada: Patient and Community Perspectives.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Creating Safe Connections: A Co-Designed E-Learning Module to Advance Equity and Social Accountability in Preventative Primary Care.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHealth Equity Assessments (HEAs) are decision-support frameworks or tools used to evaluate the equity impacts of policies, programmes and initiatives. However, HEAs are often conducted without meaningful engagement from the individuals and communities most affected by health inequities. This lack of social participation limits the relevance and effectiveness of HEAs, leaving systemic inequities unaddressed and opportunities for impactful change unrealized. An alternative is to involve people with diverse lived/living experiences in conducting and offering HEAs-so that people most impacted, and most excluded by decision-making can offer recommendations to improve the way they access and utilise care.
methodsEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT) is a scalable, participatory citizen engagement model that integrates lived/living experiences into the HEA process. EMPaCT's Five Steps to a Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) was co-designed with community members typically excluded from decision-making. This process fosters psychological safety, trust-building, and power-sharing between underserved communities and decision-makers. The CEn-HEA systematically analyzes inequities across downstream (individual), midstream (community), and upstream (structural) levels to generate actionable, equity-focused recommendations.
resultsThe EMPaCT CEn-HEA framework produces context-specific recommendations that address immediate project needs while advancing long-term, systemic change. The framework is a participatory process that centres community voices, builds trust, amplifies lived/living expertise, and fosters equity-driven decision-making that can lead to measurable improvements in healthcare policies, programmes, and practices.
conclusionIn this paper, we examine the challenges and opportunities associated HEAs; introduce EMPaCT's CEn-HEA framework as a co-designed, innovative, and community-engaged approach to health equity analysis; and discuss methods for measuring and evaluating the health equity impacts of these efforts. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and community involvement were central to the design, development and implementation of this project and resulting manuscript. Equity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), including its Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) framework, was co-created with diverse patient partners who have lived/living experiences of health inequities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners were involved in codesign sessions to define the focus, structure and language of the manuscript. They collaborated in discussions to refine key concepts, articulate challenges and highlight solutions that are grounded in their lived realities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners reviewed early drafts, contributed feedback to ensure accessibility and relevance of the content and shaped the actionable recommendations. This manuscript reflects EMPaCT's commitment to justice, inclusion and meaningful change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.