Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40101202›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all.

Ambreen Sayani, Linda Monteith, Anam Shahil-Feroz, Diya Srinivasan, Isra Amsdr, Fatah Awil, Emily Cordeaux, Victoria Garcia, Ryan Hinds, Tara Jeji and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bridging Housing and Health Inequities: A Qualitative Study on Potential Solutions From the Perspectives of Recently Arrived Migrants and Refugees in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ambreen SayaniWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-7769
Linda MonteithEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anam Shahil-FerozArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Diya SrinivasanWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Isra AmsdrEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fatah AwilEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emily CordeauxWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Victoria GarciaEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ryan HindsEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara JejiEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Omar KhanEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bee LeeEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mursal MusawiEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jill RobinsonEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Staceyan SterlingEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dean WardakEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kelly WuEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mohadessa KhawariWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Meghan GilfoyleWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alies MaybeeEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

This study was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (# TLP - 185094).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth Equity Assessments (HEAs) are decision-support frameworks or tools used to evaluate the equity impacts of policies, programmes and initiatives. However, HEAs are often conducted without meaningful engagement from the individuals and communities most affected by health inequities. This lack of social participation limits the relevance and effectiveness of HEAs, leaving systemic inequities unaddressed and opportunities for impactful change unrealized. An alternative is to involve people with diverse lived/living experiences in conducting and offering HEAs-so that people most impacted, and most excluded by decision-making can offer recommendations to improve the way they access and utilise care.

methodsEquity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT) is a scalable, participatory citizen engagement model that integrates lived/living experiences into the HEA process. EMPaCT's Five Steps to a Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) was co-designed with community members typically excluded from decision-making. This process fosters psychological safety, trust-building, and power-sharing between underserved communities and decision-makers. The CEn-HEA systematically analyzes inequities across downstream (individual), midstream (community), and upstream (structural) levels to generate actionable, equity-focused recommendations.

resultsThe EMPaCT CEn-HEA framework produces context-specific recommendations that address immediate project needs while advancing long-term, systemic change. The framework is a participatory process that centres community voices, builds trust, amplifies lived/living expertise, and fosters equity-driven decision-making that can lead to measurable improvements in healthcare policies, programmes, and practices.

conclusionIn this paper, we examine the challenges and opportunities associated HEAs; introduce EMPaCT's CEn-HEA framework as a co-designed, innovative, and community-engaged approach to health equity analysis; and discuss methods for measuring and evaluating the health equity impacts of these efforts. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and community involvement were central to the design, development and implementation of this project and resulting manuscript. Equity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), including its Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) framework, was co-created with diverse patient partners who have lived/living experiences of health inequities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners were involved in codesign sessions to define the focus, structure and language of the manuscript. They collaborated in discussions to refine key concepts, articulate challenges and highlight solutions that are grounded in their lived realities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners reviewed early drafts, contributed feedback to ensure accessibility and relevance of the content and shaped the actionable recommendations. This manuscript reflects EMPaCT's commitment to justice, inclusion and meaningful change.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth EquityCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchDecision MakingHumansCEn‐HEAcommunity engaged health equity analysisdiversityEMPaCTequityhealth equityhealth equity analysisinclusionpatient engagementpatient‐oriented researchpower

Identifiers

PMID40101202
PMCPMC11918782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.