ArticleBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2025
Penetrating Cardiac Injury: A 20-Year Retrospective Analysis at a High-Complexity University Center.
Article in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Self-limiting penetrating cardiothoracic injury from a barbed shark dart involving the right atrium.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPenetrating cardiac injury, though infrequent, is associated with substantial mortality. In 2005, our research team conducted a comprehensive retrospective analysis of penetrating cardiac injuries managed at our facility from 1990 to 2003. Now, two decades later, we conducted the present study on penetrating cardiac injuries attended in our hospital over the last 20 years.
methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of medical records and trauma database data, with a focus on survivors of penetrating cardiac trauma, excluding those deceased upon arrival.
resultsOut of 1,093 cases, 25 had penetrating cardiac injuries with an overall mortality rate of 36%. Hemorrhage was the leading cause of death, and survival was correlated with higher systolic blood pressure upon admission and the level of consciousness.
conclusionThe study highlights the need for rapid intervention and emphasizes the importance of managing bleeding and supporting hemodynamics. It also points to areas for improvement in emergency care and the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.