ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025
Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring surprisal in sound sequences.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Pupil- and gaze dynamics track emotion content in naturalistic speech.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Chimeric Music Reveals an Interaction of Pitch and Time in Electrophysiological Signatures of Music Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of speech periodicity and speech rate on auditory-motor coupling during speech comprehension.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cortical tracking of stimulus features is a crucial neural requisite of how we process continuous music. We here tested whether cortical tracking of the beat, typically related to rhythm processing, is modulated by pitch predictability and other top-down factors. Participants listened to tonal (high pitch predictability) and atonal (low pitch predictability) music while undergoing electroencephalography. We analyzed their cortical tracking of the acoustic envelope. Cortical envelope tracking was stronger while listening to atonal music, potentially reflecting listeners' violated pitch expectations and increased attention allocation. Envelope tracking was also stronger with more expertise and enjoyment. Furthermore, we showed cortical tracking of pitch surprisal (using IDyOM), which suggests that listeners' expectations match those computed by the IDyOM model, with higher surprisal for atonal music. Behaviorally, we measured participants' ability to finger-tap to the beat of tonal and atonal sequences in two experiments. Finger-tapping performance was better in the tonal condition, indicating a positive effect of pitch predictability on behavioral rhythm processing. Cortical envelope tracking predicted tapping performance for tonal music, as did pitch-surprisal tracking for atonal music, indicating that high and low predictability might impose different processing regimes. Taken together, our results show various ways that top-down factors impact musical rhythm processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.