Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40101105›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025

Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise.

Anne Keitel, Claire Pelofi, Xinyi Guan, Emily Watson, Lucy Wight, Sarah Allen, Iris Mencke, Christian Keitel, Johanna Rimmele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measuring surprisal in sound sequences.Behavior research methods · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Chimeric Music Reveals an Interaction of Pitch and Time in Electrophysiological Signatures of Music Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne KeitelDepartment of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-0146
Claire PelofiDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
Xinyi GuanMax Planck NYU Center for Language, Music, and Emotion, New York, New York, USA.
Emily WatsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Lucy WightDepartment of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Sarah AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Iris MenckeDepartment of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Christian Keitel *Department of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Johanna Rimmele *Max Planck NYU Center for Language, Music, and Emotion, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 510788453Medical Research Council MR/W02912X/1Royal Society of Edinburgh 1963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cortical tracking of stimulus features is a crucial neural requisite of how we process continuous music. We here tested whether cortical tracking of the beat, typically related to rhythm processing, is modulated by pitch predictability and other top-down factors. Participants listened to tonal (high pitch predictability) and atonal (low pitch predictability) music while undergoing electroencephalography. We analyzed their cortical tracking of the acoustic envelope. Cortical envelope tracking was stronger while listening to atonal music, potentially reflecting listeners' violated pitch expectations and increased attention allocation. Envelope tracking was also stronger with more expertise and enjoyment. Furthermore, we showed cortical tracking of pitch surprisal (using IDyOM), which suggests that listeners' expectations match those computed by the IDyOM model, with higher surprisal for atonal music. Behaviorally, we measured participants' ability to finger-tap to the beat of tonal and atonal sequences in two experiments. Finger-tapping performance was better in the tonal condition, indicating a positive effect of pitch predictability on behavioral rhythm processing. Cortical envelope tracking predicted tapping performance for tonal music, as did pitch-surprisal tracking for atonal music, indicating that high and low predictability might impose different processing regimes. Taken together, our results show various ways that top-down factors impact musical rhythm processing.

Indexed as

MusicPitch PerceptionPleasureAcoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEEGmusical expertisemusic perceptionnaturalistic musicpitch surprisaltop‐down influences

Identifiers

PMID40101105
PMCPMC11998481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.