ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2025
Prognosis and Risk Stratification in Dilated Cardiomyopathy With LVEF≤35%: Cardiac MRI Insights for Better Outcomes.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Procedural circulatory support-enabled intracoronary cell delivery in advanced dilated cardiomyopathy.iScience · 2026Article
- AI-Powered Detection of Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar from Dual-Sequence CT: Global and Segmental Prediction Validated by CMR.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Redefining Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Integrative Approach.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Metabolic and nutritional stress-associated dilated cardiomyopathy in the setting of semaglutide use and long-term nicotine replacement therapy: a case report and literature review.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a moving target?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillators for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤35%. However, its effectiveness is hindered by the inability to reliably discriminate between the risk of SCD and competing death of heart failure deterioration, thereby limiting its clinical utility. We aimed to refine the SCD risk stratification model based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with LVEF≤35%.
methodsA total of 1272 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with LVEF≤35% who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were consecutively enrolled in this study. The primary end point is a composite of SCD or aborted SCD and the second end point is a composite of heart failure death and heart transplantation.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 86.3 months, 101 patients reached the primary end point. In the adjusted analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04];
conclusionsPatients with dilated cardiomyopathy with late gadolinium enhancement≥7.5% were at heightened risk of SCD events, which can be used for risk assessment. Risk stratifications for SCD, combining clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may potentially guide decision-making for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.