ArticlePloS one2025
Non-customized data asset evaluation based on knowledge graph and value entropy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid expansion of non-customized data assets, developing reliable and objective methods for their valuation has become essential. However, current evaluation techniques often face challenges such as incomplete indicator systems and an over-reliance on subjective judgment. To address these issues, this study presents a structured framework comprising 17 key indicators for assessing data asset value. A neural network is employed to calculate indicator weights, which reduces subjectivity and enhances the accuracy of the assessment. Additionally, knowledge graph techniques are used to organize and visualize relationships among the indicators, providing a comprehensive evaluation view. The proposed model combines information entropy and the TOPSIS method to refine asset valuation by integrating indicator weights and performance metrics. To validate the model, it is applied to two datasets: Bitcoin market data from the past seven years and BYD stock data. The Bitcoin dataset demonstrates the model's capability to capture market trends and assess purchasing potential, while the BYD stock dataset highlights its adaptability across diverse financial assets. The successful application of these cases confirms the model's effectiveness in supporting data-driven asset management and pricing. This framework provides a systematic methodology for data asset valuation, offering significant theoretical and practical implications for asset pricing and management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.