ArticlePloS one2025
Randomised, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A clinical trial protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05914155 (The Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab (Genetical Recombination) for the Treatment for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy With Nephrotic Syndrome （PRIME Study）
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic mechanisms and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: The future potential for SRNS diagnosis.iScience · 2026Review
- A comparative study on the efficacy of rituximab combined with tacrolimus and methylprednisolone in the treatment of patients with moderate-high risk idiopathic membranous nephropathy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Japan, corticosteroid monotherapy has traditionally been recommended as the first-line therapy for membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome. In contrast, except for Japan, rituximab is recommended as the first-line therapy for membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome. This clinical trial aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of the intravenous administration of rituximab without steroids or immunosuppressants as an induction therapy in Japanese patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome. This was a multicentre (15 in Japan), placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative study. A total of 88 patients diagnosed with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to rituximab and placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio; rituximab 1,000 mg or placebo IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks for two doses in a double-blinded manner. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving less than 1.0 g/g creatinine in urine protein/creatinine ratio in random urine at 26 weeks after the first administration of rituximab or placebo. This study was approved by the institutional review boards and conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05914155 and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCT2041230037 on 13 June 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.