ArticlePloS one2025
Individual participant data network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted in the field of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and the evidence shows small to moderate effect sizes in improving mental health outcomes. However, there is considerable heterogeneity due to variation in participants, interventions and contexts. It is therefore important to establish which participant and intervention characteristics affect the different psychosocial outcomes in different contexts. Individual Participant Network Meta-analysis (IPDNMA) is a gold-standard method to estimate moderating effects, compare the effectiveness of different interventions and thus answer the question of which intervention is best-suited for whom. We will conduct an IPDNMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychosocial interventions for IPV survivors aimed at improving mental health, psychosocial outcomes such as self-efficacy and quality of life, reducing IPV and increasing safety-behaviours and dropout from the intervention (as an indication of intervention acceptability) compared to any type of control (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023488502). We aim to establish collaborations with the authors of eligible RCTs, to obtain and harmonise the Individual Participant Data of the trials. We will conduct one-stage IPDNMA under a Bayesian framework using the multinma package in R, after testing which characteristics of the participants and interventions are effect modifiers. We anticipate that not all study authors will provide access to IPD, which is a limitation of IPDNMA. We aim to address this by combining studies with aggregate data and studies with IPD using Multi-Level Network Meta-Regression (ML-NMR) implemented in the multinma R package. This approach is novel in the field and makes full use of available evidence to inform clinical and policy-related decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.