Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100883›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A comprehensive survey and comparative analysis of time series data augmentation in medical wearable computing.

Md Abid Hasan, Frédéric Li, Philip Gouverneur, Artur Piet, Marcin Grzegorzek

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Abid HasanGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0240-1708
Frédéric LiGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-4207
Philip GouverneurInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-2291
Artur PietInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-8363
Marcin GrzegorzekGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in hardware technology have spurred a surge in the popularity and ubiquity of wearable sensors, opening up new applications within the medical domain. This proliferation has resulted in a notable increase in the availability of Time Series (TS) data characterizing behavioral or physiological information from the patient, leading to initiatives toward leveraging machine learning and data analysis techniques. Nonetheless, the complexity and time required for collecting data remain significant hurdles, limiting dataset sizes and hindering the effectiveness of machine learning. Data Augmentation (DA) stands out as a prime solution, facilitating the generation of synthetic data to address challenges associated with acquiring medical data. DA has shown to consistently improve performances when images are involved. As a result, investigations have been carried out to check DA for TS, in particular for TS classification. However, the current state of DA in TS classification faces challenges, including methodological taxonomies restricted to the univariate case, insufficient direction to select suitable DA methods and a lack of conclusive evidence regarding the amount of synthetic data required to attain optimal outcomes. This paper conducts a comprehensive survey and experiments on DA techniques for TS and their application to TS classification. We propose an updated taxonomy spanning across three families of Time Series Data Augmentation (TSDA): Random Transformation (RT), Pattern Mixing (PM), and Generative Models (GM). Additionally, we empirically evaluate 12 TSDA methods across diverse datasets used in medical-related applications, including OPPORTUNITY and HAR for Human Activity Recognition, DEAP for emotion recognition, BioVid Heat Pain Database (BVDB), and PainMonit Database (PMDB) for pain recognition. Through comprehensive experimental analysis, we identify the most optimal DA techniques and provide recommendations for researchers regarding the generation of synthetic data to maximize outcomes from DA methods. Our findings show that despite their simplicity, DA methods of the RT family are the most consistent in increasing performances compared to not using any augmentation.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesHumansMachine LearningSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40100883
PMCPMC11957733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.