ArticlePloS one2025
A comprehensive survey and comparative analysis of time series data augmentation in medical wearable computing.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in hardware technology have spurred a surge in the popularity and ubiquity of wearable sensors, opening up new applications within the medical domain. This proliferation has resulted in a notable increase in the availability of Time Series (TS) data characterizing behavioral or physiological information from the patient, leading to initiatives toward leveraging machine learning and data analysis techniques. Nonetheless, the complexity and time required for collecting data remain significant hurdles, limiting dataset sizes and hindering the effectiveness of machine learning. Data Augmentation (DA) stands out as a prime solution, facilitating the generation of synthetic data to address challenges associated with acquiring medical data. DA has shown to consistently improve performances when images are involved. As a result, investigations have been carried out to check DA for TS, in particular for TS classification. However, the current state of DA in TS classification faces challenges, including methodological taxonomies restricted to the univariate case, insufficient direction to select suitable DA methods and a lack of conclusive evidence regarding the amount of synthetic data required to attain optimal outcomes. This paper conducts a comprehensive survey and experiments on DA techniques for TS and their application to TS classification. We propose an updated taxonomy spanning across three families of Time Series Data Augmentation (TSDA): Random Transformation (RT), Pattern Mixing (PM), and Generative Models (GM). Additionally, we empirically evaluate 12 TSDA methods across diverse datasets used in medical-related applications, including OPPORTUNITY and HAR for Human Activity Recognition, DEAP for emotion recognition, BioVid Heat Pain Database (BVDB), and PainMonit Database (PMDB) for pain recognition. Through comprehensive experimental analysis, we identify the most optimal DA techniques and provide recommendations for researchers regarding the generation of synthetic data to maximize outcomes from DA methods. Our findings show that despite their simplicity, DA methods of the RT family are the most consistent in increasing performances compared to not using any augmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.