ArticlePloS one2025
Leveraging machine learning for enhanced and interpretable risk prediction of venous thromboembolism in acute ischemic stroke care.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for risk stratification in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism: retrospective study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- The Caprini score for venous thromboembolism risk assessment: A scoping review of applications, validation, and future directions.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for predicting venous thromboembolism in septic shock patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of in-hospital deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- A nomogram for predicting hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening complication commonly occurring after acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with an increased risk of mortality. Traditional risk assessment tools lack precision in predicting VTE in AIS patients due to the omission of stroke-specific factors.
methodsWe developed a machine learning model using clinical data from patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) admitted between December 2021 and December 2023. Predictive models were developed using machine learning algorithms, including Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR). Feature selection involved stepwise logistic regression and LASSO, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) used to enhance model interpretability. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
resultsAmong the 1,632 AIS patients analyzed, 4.17% developed VTE. The GBM model achieved the highest predictive accuracy with an AUC of 0.923, outperforming other models such as Random Forest and Logistic Regression. The model demonstrated strong sensitivity (90.83%) and specificity (93.83%) in identifying high-risk patients. SHAP analysis revealed that key predictors of VTE risk included elevated D-dimer levels, premorbid mRS, and large vessel occlusion, offering clinicians valuable insights for personalized treatment decisions.
conclusionThis study provides an accurate and interpretable method to predict VTE risk in patients with AIS using the GBM model, potentially improving early detection rates and reducing morbidity. Further validation is needed to assess its broader clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.