ArticlePloS one2025
Types, method, and mode of implementation of pain/symptom maps in musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain maps are tools used for assessing the extent, location, or distribution of pain or symptoms for clinical or research purposes. Pain mapping involves a transformational representation of patients' experiences of pain into a graphical, numerical, or descriptive form that typically requires a patient to indicate the affected body regions and may include additional information such as qualitative description or intensity. In preparation for innovative technology-enabled development of quantifiable pain maps, this review will focus on the methodological aspects of recent pain maps in addition to the reported measurement properties of each mapping approach. This will identify current gaps in knowledge, consistencies in implementation, and inform directions for future development of more person-centric and meaningful pain maps. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the commonly used types of pain/symptom maps in musculoskeletal pain by classifying design (types) across five categorical features: scalability, region-specificity, aspect or orientation, segmentation, and sex identification, and investigate their methods and modes of implementation.
methodsKey sources of evidence such as Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, will be searched from inception to June 5, 2024, including grey literature from reference screening, library and organizational collections such as WorldCat, ProQuest Global Dissertation, Google Scholar, and Google to find descriptions or evaluations of pain/symptom maps in people with pain of a primarily musculoskeletal origin. Studies reporting standard patient-reported pain or body mapping interventions will be considered but studies that present X-ray or CT or MRI scans or artistic body maps will be excluded. Primary outcomes include 'types' of design: scale, segments, sex, orientation, region; pain mapping methods: marking, shading, checking; and mode of implementation: paper, digital, etc. Secondary outcomes include axis I: pain location, extent or distribution; and axis II: pain severity, intensity, and quality. Eligibility screening and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The review is intended to initiate research that promotes the integration of data-friendly solutions and supports the application of machine learning in musculoskeletal pain evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.