ArticlePloS one2025
The analysis of rural revitalization serviceplatform in smart city under back propagation neural network.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A deep neural network-based green space design optimization framework for smart cities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve rural revitalization and enhance the development of rural tourism, this study employs a back propagation neural network (BPNN) to construct a rural revitalization development model. Additionally, the Grey Relation Analysis (GRA) algorithm is used to classify rural revitalization efforts across different cities. Consistency testing is applied to analyze rural revitalization indicators, and a tourism service evaluation model is established to assess rural revitalization tourism services from the perspective of smart cities. The research results indicate that: (1) the training results and expected values of the ten cities are relatively consistent, and the classification of rural revitalization development is good; (2) The five major indicators of tourism information services, tourism security services, tourism transportation services, tourism environment services, and tourism management services all meet the consistency test, and the consistency test results are all less than 0.1, confirming the reliability and effectiveness of the research data; (3) The tourism information and management services are mainly evaluated at level C, accounting for 62% and 62.5% respectively. The tourism transportation and safety services are mainly evaluated at level D, and the model can indicate the level of rural revitalization tourism service; (4) Compared with other algorithms, the GRA-BPNN algorithm performs the best in rural revitalization evaluation, with an accuracy of 92.3%, precision of 91.8%, recall rate of 93.7%, and F1 score of 92.7%. This study optimizes the rural revitalization tourism service platform, enhances the quality of rural tourism, promotes the development of the rural tourism industry, and contributes to the realization of rural revitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.