Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100826›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Identifying healthcare needs with patient experience reviews using ChatGPT.

Jiaxuan Li, Yunchu Yang, Rong Chen, Dashun Zheng, Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang, Chi Kin Lam, Dennis Wong, Yapeng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiaxuan LiFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Yunchu YangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Rong ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dashun ZhengFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Patrick Cheong-Iao PangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-5443
Chi Kin LamFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Dennis WongFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Yapeng WangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1085-5091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValuable findings can be obtained through data mining in patients' online reviews. Also identifying healthcare needs from the patient's perspective can more accurately improve the quality of care and the experience of the visit. Thereby avoiding unnecessary waste of health care resources. The large language model (LLM) can be a promising tool due to research that demonstrates its outstanding performance and potential in directions such as data mining, healthcare management, and more.

objectiveWe aim to propose a methodology to address this problem, specifically, the recent breakthrough of LLM can be leveraged for effectively understanding healthcare needs from patient experience reviews.

methodsWe used 504,198 reviews collected from a large online medical platform, haodf.com. We used the reviews to create Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) templates, which categorized patient reviews into three categories, reflecting the areas of concern of patients. With the introduction of thought chains, we embedded ABSA templates into the prompts for ChatGPT, which was then used to identify patient needs.

resultsOur method has a weighted total precision of 0.944, which was outstanding compared to the direct narrative tasks in ChatGPT-4o, which have a weighted total precision of 0.890. Weighted total recall and F1 scores also reached 0.884 and 0.912 respectively, surpassing the 0.802 and 0.843 scores for "direct narratives in ChatGPT." Finally, the accuracy of the three sampling methods was 91.8%, 91.7%, and 91.2%, with an average accuracy of over 91.5%.

conclusionsCombining ChatGPT with ABSA templates can achieve satisfactory results in analyzing patient reviews. As our work applies to other LLMs, we shed light on understanding the demands of patients and health consumers with novel models, which can contribute to the agenda of enhancing patient experience and better healthcare resource allocations effectively.

Indexed as

Data MiningHealth Services Needs and DemandPatient SatisfactionGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID40100826
PMCPMC11918364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.