ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Exploring the experiences of leprosy stigma among patients and healthcare workers in Norte de Santander, Colombia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intersectional dimensions of stigma in neglected tropical diseases: a systematic review of evidence and implications for equity-based health policy.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Factors associated with disability among patients with leprosy: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Experiences and perceptions on diagnostic delay of leprosy by affected people in Colombia: A qualitative study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Delayed diagnosis as a barrier to Zero Leprosy: Lived experiences from Pakistan.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Leprosy elimination: are we winning the fight or losing focus?Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Decoding leprosy: immune response, clinical manifestations and emerging diagnostic approaches.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines leprosy-related stigma among patients and healthcare professionals in Colombia. Leprosy, classified as a WHO-listed NTD, is a chronic nerve disease causing sensory loss, disabilities, and deformities when untreated. This contributes to stigma, reducing quality of life, healthcare access, and income. Despite Colombia achieving WHO's prevalence goal, some regions still face high detection rates. As a result, leprosy remains a challenge due to an incomplete understanding of the complete disease burden and its intertwined factors. The study consisted of 25 interviews with patients and healthcare workers, and field visits in Colombia's Norte de Santander Department. Employing a constructivist approach to contextualize leprosy in Colombia through historical and socio-economic factors we integrate participants' perspectives to enable flexibility beyond psychology's rigid stigma categories and the disease's narrow focus. Our research findings confirm regional research on patient stigmatization, including anticipated, internal, and experienced stigma, with a particular focus on the structural level and intersectional factors. This stigma becomes apparent when examining the organization of the healthcare system, the allocation of resources for leprosy prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, and the inadequate attention to patients' mental health. Furthermore, we describe the commercialization of healthcare in Colombia, which perpetuates this situation by undermining the previously established leprosy community network, reducing the disease to a mere bacteriological perspective, and silencing patient narratives. Our research provides valuable insights for enhancing leprosy case detection, diagnosis, treatment, and social inclusion, ultimately improving patients' quality of life. Recommendations for Colombia's public health policies include involving patient expertise in leprosy programs, enhancing national clinical history systems, implementing active case detection, tailoring treatments to local contexts, and encouraging patient participation in comprehensive public initiatives. These measures empower patients, positively impact their mental well-being, and combat the stigma entrenched in Colombian society and institutions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.