Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100804›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Barriers to cervical cancer screening among refugee women: A systematic review.

Md Anwer Hossain, Shimlin Jahan Khanam, Md Nuruzzaman Khan, John Oldroyd, Rakibul M Islam

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Anwer HossainLaboratory of Fertility and Well-Being, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8728-5250
Shimlin Jahan KhanamDepartment of Population Science, Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6500-4537
Md Nuruzzaman KhanDepartment of Population Science, Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
John OldroydSchool of Behavioral and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Rakibul M IslamSouth Asian Institute for Social Transformation (SAIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer disproportionately affects vulnerable populations including refugee women. Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake in this group is crucial to inform targeted interventions and improve health outcomes. This review aimed to identify barriers hindering their access to cervical cancer screening. Five databases - Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS - were searched in December 2024. The inclusion criteria included studies - a) targeting healthy refugee women, b) conducted in community or hospital/clinic settings, c) reporting barriers to cervical cancer screening from the women's perspective, and d) published in English. Thematic analysis was performed to identify the barriers. The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eleven studies, seven from the USA, one from each of the UK, Australia, South Korea and Jordan, were included in this review. Of these, six were qualitative, three were quantitative and two were mixed methods studies. There was a consistent pattern of lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and cancer screening in refugee women. A unique barrier was women's negative experiences in refugee camps. Four interconnected themes emerged including 1) individual level barriers, 2) cultural and religious barriers, 3) social and structural barriers, and 4) healthcare system barriers. Ninety percent of included studies were assessed as medium or high quality. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to address the diverse challenges faced by refugee women globally which hinder their access to cervical cancer screening. Strategies should include culturally sensitive awareness campaigns, active engagement of healthcare professionals, and structural reforms within healthcare systems to enhance cervical cancer screening uptake among refugee women.

Identifiers

PMID40100804
PMCPMC11918313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.