Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100629›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Reinforcement learning-based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management.

Kairui Feng, Ning Lin, Robert E Kopp, Siyuan Xian, Michael Oppenheimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reinforcement learning-based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kairui FengNational Key Laboratory of Autonomous Intelligent Unmanned Systems, Tongji University, Shanghai 201210, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8978-2480
Ning LinDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-5571-1606
Robert E KoppDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854.ORCID 0000-0003-4016-9428
Siyuan XianDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Michael OppenheimerSchool of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-5914

Funding

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 62088101National Science Foundation (NSF) 1652448National Science Foundation (NSF) 2103754Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2021SHZDZX0100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional computational models of climate adaptation frameworks inadequately consider decision-makers' capacity to learn, update, and improve decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of reinforcement learning (RL), a machine learning technique that efficaciously acquires knowledge from the environment and systematically optimizes dynamic decisions, in modeling and informing adaptive climate decision-making. We consider coastal flood risk mitigations for Manhattan, New York City, USA (NYC), illustrating the benefit of continuously incorporating observations of sea-level rise into systematic designs of adaptive strategies. We find that when designing adaptive seawalls to protect NYC, the RL-derived strategy significantly reduces the expected net cost by 6 to 36% under the moderate emissions scenario SSP2-4.5 (9 to 77% under the high emissions scenario SSP5-8.5), compared to conventional methods. When considering multiple adaptive policies, including accomodation and retreat as well as protection, the RL approach leads to a further 5% (15%) cost reduction, showing RL's flexibility in coordinatively addressing complex policy design problems. RL also outperforms conventional methods in controlling tail risk (i.e., low probability, high impact outcomes) and in avoiding losses induced by misinformation about the climate state (e.g., deep uncertainty), demonstrating the importance of systematic learning and updating in addressing extremes and uncertainties related to climate adaptation.

Indexed as

climate adaptationcoastal protectionflexible adaptationreinforcement learningsea-level rise

Identifiers

PMID40100629
PMCPMC11962498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.