ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Muscles Functioning as Primary Shoulder Movers Aid the Rotator Cuff Muscles in Increasing Active Glenohumeral Stiffness.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder replacement with an intact rotator cuff: a comparative musculoskeletal simulation study of glenohumeral joint biomechanics.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeActive stability is essential to preventing dislocations and the focus of rehabilitation following dislocations. This is thought to arise from shoulder muscles compressing the humeral head into the glenoid (called concavity compression). However, shoulder muscles may also resist humeral head translation through increases in intrinsic muscle stiffness, an unexplored mechanism. Our objective was to quantify shoulder muscles' contributions to changes in glenohumeral stiffness, or the resistance to humeral head translation. We hypothesized that primary shoulder movers (e.g., the pectoralis major or deltoid) would differ from rotator cuff muscles in how much they increase glenohumeral stiffness because they leverage their intrinsic stiffness in addition to concavity compression.
methodsWe measured glenohumeral stiffness across a range of isometric muscle activation levels in shoulder abduction and used electromyography to estimate the contributions of rotator cuff muscles and primary shoulder movers. We then created a musculoskeletal model to evaluate individual muscle contributions to glenohumeral stiffness through both concavity compression and intrinsic muscle stiffness.
resultsWe found that muscle activity in primary shoulder movers was a better predictor of active glenohumeral stiffness than in rotator cuff muscles (R
conclusionOur results emphasize the importance of primary shoulder movers as active stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint and highlight their potential importance in preventing shoulder dislocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.