ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Characteristics of the electron beam outside the applicator in an Elekta Versa HD Linac.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comparative Analysis of Peripheral Dose Measurement Between Apex and Agility Collimators in Linear Accelerators.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an essential component of cancer treatment, but healthy tissues can be exposed to out-of-field doses, potentially causing adverse effects and secondary cancers. This study investigates peripheral doses outside the electron beam applicator in an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator. Peripheral doses outside an electron applicator were measured using 6, 9, and 12 MeV beams at their respective maximum dose depths while maintaining a 100 cm source-to-surface distance. Measurements employed EBT3 films within Plastic Water DT phantoms. The influence of field size on penumbra width and peripheral doses were examined using various cutouts (6 × 6 cm², 10 × 10 cm², and a 5 cm diameter circle) within a 10 × 10 cm² applicator, with gantry and collimator angles set to 0 degrees. Additionally, the impact of collimator angles on penumbra width and peripheral doses was explored, enhancing the understanding of dose distribution. Measured profiles were also compared with those calculated using Monaco treatment planning system. Findings showed that both penumbra width and peripheral dose values increased with energy across different field sizes and collimator angles. Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) analysis indicated deviations of 1.8 mm for penumbra and 1.1% for peripheral doses between measured profiles and Treatment Planning System (TPS) predictions for all field sizes. Peripheral doses remained below 5% of the maximum dose at distances ranging from 10 to 15 mm away from the field edges, indicating acceptable tolerance levels (ICRU report 24). However, further dose reduction may be possible with additional shielding to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable. This study highlights the critical importance of considering peripheral doses in radiotherapy, emphasizing the need to evaluate the impact on healthy tissues outside the primary treatment area to ensure patient safety and mitigate long-term treatment-related side effects. The findings underscore the necessity of implementing appropriate measures to minimize peripheral doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.